Vivek Kumar Jain v. Tikaram Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
Withdrawal-of-petition order, usable at most as procedural practice reference, not as substantive precedent. Keywords: dismissed as withdrawn; permission to withdraw petition; liberty to file better constituted petition; NAFR (Not For Report); unopposed prayer; State counsel non-opposition. Parties: Vivek Kumar Jain (petitioner, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, C.G.); Respondent No. 1 Tikaram Sahu (Village Chimagondi); Respondent Nos. 2-5 revenue authorities: Commissioner Durg Division, Collector Kawardha, Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kawardha, Tahsildar Kawardha. Bench/court: Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WPC No. 392 of 2026; decided 19/02/2026. No statute, section, precedent, dissent, or quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a better constituted petition in accordance with law, upon dismissal of the present petition as withdrawn.