that on account of a demarcation alleged to be conducted in absence of respondent No. 6, a stay order was granted by the Naib Tahsildar, therefore, respondent No.6 filed an application for the transfer of the aforesaid revenue case under Section 30 of the Code, 1959, before the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue). Thereafter, the SDO (Revenue) called for the record of the aforesaid revenue case. Due to such transfer of the record, the revenue case remained pending before the Naib Tahsildar. Hence, the SDO (Revenue), Bilaspur (respondent No.2), may be directed to send back the aforesaid revenue case for proper adjudication. Counsel also submits that since respondents No.4 to 6 violated the stay order passed by the Naib Tahsildar, the petitioner filed an application (Annexure-P/6) before the Collector, but the same has not been decided till date.