Disposed¶32

Ku. Anjani v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court (Single Bench, Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.) – Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India – clash of examination dates

Chhattisgarh HC1 Jun 2026WPC/2755/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

D.El.Ed. Second Year examination scheduled 08.06.2026 clashing with CGPSC main examination date; prayer to reschedule examination timetable refused; alternative opportunity to appear in D.El.Ed. examination in November 2026; writ under Article 226; Board of Secondary Education Raipur; Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission; SCERT; disposed at motion stage; WPC No. 2755 of 2026; Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi.

What did the court decide?

The Court declined to grant relief because an opportunity is available to the Petitioners to participate in the second D.El.Ed. examination to be held in November, 2026; the Court was not inclined to grant any relief to the Petitioners. ¶31

Ku. Anjani Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2026)

CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN

2026:CGHC:23537

NAFR

Digitally signed by CHANDRAKANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.06.03 11:33:45 +0530

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPC No. 2755 of 2026

¶8

Ku. Anjani D/o Late Shri Mohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No.1, Laxmi Chowk, Nagar Panchayat, Pipariya, TahsilKawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶9

Mahendra Kumar Patel S/o Shri Deepak Kumar Patel, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Aramsahi, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.).

¶10

... Petitioner(s)

¶11

versus

¶12

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The School Education Department, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.).

¶13

The Secretary, Board Of Secondary Education, Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.).

¶14

The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, North Block, Sector- 19, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.).

¶15

The Director, State Council Of Educational Research And Training, Geetanjali Colony, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s)

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harishankar Patel and Mr. Sanjay Sahu, Advocate.

¶17

For Respondents No1. and : Ms. Diksha Gauraha, Dy. Govt. 4/ State Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate.

¶18

¶19

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

¶20

Order On Board

¶21

02/06/2026

¶22

1. Heard.

¶23

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief(s) :-

¶24

(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the case from the respondent authorities.

¶25

(ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby directing the respondent authorities to change the time table for examination of D.El.Ed. Second Year scheduled for 08.06.2026 and to reschedule the said examination of D.El.Ed. Second Year for other day when the examination of CGPSC is not scheduled.

¶26

(iii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case including cost of litigation.

¶27

1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners would submit that Respondent No.2/The Secretary, Board Of Secondary Education, Raipur has fixed 08/06/2026 as the date for the examination of D.El.Ed. On the same date, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission/Respondent No.3 is going to conduct its main examination. The Petitioners intend to participate in both the examinations, but since there is a clash of dates of both the examinations, i.e., 08/06/2026, therefore,

¶28

¶29

Respondent No.2 be directed to change the date, i.e., 08/06/2026 for D.El.Ed. Examination to some other date.

¶30

1. In reply, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2 would submit that D.El.Ed. examination is conducted twice in a year. If Petitioners cannot appear on 08/06/2026 because of PSC examination, they may appear in next examination of D.El.Ed., which is to be held in the month of November, 2026. He further submits that earlier also, the same situation had arisen, but PSC itself had changed the date. He further submits that since there is an opportunity available to Petitioners to appear in D.El.Ed. examination to be held in the month of November, 2026, therefore, this petition may be dismissed.

¶31

1. Having considered the aforesaid contention of learned Counsel for the respondent, since there is an opportunity available to the Petitioners to participate in the second examination of D.El.Ed. to be held in the month of November, 2026, hence this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the Petitioners.

¶32

1. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of at the motion stage itself.

¶33

1. In view of above, pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶36

Chandrakant

Ku. Anjani v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Anjani v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anupama Singh Vs Vinay Kumar Shrivastava

Sunita Developers Vs Chhattisgarh Real Estate Regulating Authority

Jairam Vs Md. Mumtaj

Gaya Ram Dubey (Petitioner in Person) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahesh Singh Mandavi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anamika Pandey Vs Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh