Dismissed¶30

Cheruram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Jun 2026WPC/2596/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file fresh duly constituted petition; WPC No. 2596 of 2026; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; petitioner Cheruram (Barjore, Kansabel, Jashpur); challenge to order dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no. 3 (Executive Director, Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj Sangh); prayer for claim compensation under clause 6 of the notified scheme with interest; dismissed as withdrawn; no objection from respondents; Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; decided 16/06/2026; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. ¶30

Cheruram Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

RAGHVENDRAJAT Digitallysigned byRAGHVENDRAJAT

¶3

2026:CGHC:23942

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 2596 of 2026

¶7

1 - Cheruram Son Of Korgaram, Aged About 54 Years Resident Of Barjore, Post Kansabel, Tahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.).

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - Secretary Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Sector -243 Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 - Executive Director Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sakhari Sangh Maryadit Bhawan Sector -24,naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

4 - Collector Jashpur, District -Jashpur (C.G.).

¶14

5 - District Forest Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

¶15

¶16

6 - Forest Range Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas ) Sakhari Sangh Maryadit Kansabel District -Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

¶17

... Respondent(s)

¶18

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Syed	Afaque Hussain Rizvi,
	Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State	: Mr. Anand D	adariya, Dy. A.G.

¶19

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

16/06/2026

¶22

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶23

“(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to setaside the impugned order dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no. 3 in the interest of justice.

¶24

(ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pay claim

¶25

compensation amount as per clause 6 ( रा�जमो�हनी� दे�वी� तें�दे�पत्ता� सा�मो�जिजक सा�राक्षा� यो�जनी� ) of the said notification with interest at the earliest, in the interest of justice.

¶26

(iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted, in the interest of justice.”

¶27

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition.

¶29

No objection has been raised from other sides.

¶30

Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶31

Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶32

Raghu Jat

Cheruram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Cheruram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonsai Dadsena Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dev Kumar Nirmalkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhagvati Prasad Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Chandra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sevati Rajendra Raj Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhanaji Parteti Vs State of Chhattisgarh