Mahabir Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2026:CGHC:22686

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 2138 of 2020

¶6

1 - Mahabir Agrawal S/o Late Shri Bajrang Lal Agrawal Aged About 50 Years Residence Of Ramnivas Talkies Road Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And District Management, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2 - The Collector (Revenue Department) , Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3 - The Nazul Officer Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶12

4 - Apex Real Infrance Pvt. Ltd., Through Director, Vikas Agrawal, R/o In Front Of Main Hospital Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

¶13

5 - Smt. Neelam Jaiswal W/o Shri Vivek Jaiswal Aged About 36 Years OccupationHousewife R/o Laltanki Road Raigarh, Tehsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

6 - Sandeep Agarwal S/o Fattechand Agarwal Aged About 40 Years OccupationBusiness, R/o House No. 217 Opposite- Balaji House Krishna Vihar Colony, Dhimrapura Chowk, Raigarh, Tehsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

7 - Smt. Sonu Bansal W/o Sandeep Agarwal Aged About 38 Years Occupation House Wife, R/o 96, Ward No. 11 Kewda Badi, Bus Stand, Raigarh, Tehsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶16

2

¶17

8 - Lokesh Kumar Sharma S/o Mahendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 31 Years Occupation- Business, R/o Jindal Road Bhagwanpur, Tehsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr. Rishab Bisen, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Government Advocate to 3 State

¶20

S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD

¶21

13/05/2026

¶22

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-

¶23

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records with regard to the auction proceeding initiated by the respondent no. 3 with regard to the land bearing Nazul Sheet No. 41, plot / khasra no. 8 area about 1550 sqft., ward Indira Nagar Tahsil and District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶24

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned auction proceeding (Annexure P-1) initiated by the respondent no. 3.

¶25

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 in light of notification dated 11.09.2019 (Annexure P-2) consider and decide finally, the petitioner's revenue case which is pending before him after given due opportunity of hearing.

¶26

10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit.

¶27

10.5 Cost of the petition may also be awarded.”

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in possession of the nazul land bearing Nazul Sheet/Plot No. 41 of Khasra No. 8 admeasuring 1550 sq. feet at Indira Nagar Ward, Tehsil & District – Raigarh since long time. The State Government had issued circular/guidelines on 11.09.2019 for allotment/settlement/Grant of Bhumi Swami right. After making payment of the amount as per the calculation to be made in accordance with the circular. After getting knowledge of the said circular, petitioner submitted an application

¶29

3

¶30

before the Respondent No. 3 for settlement of the land in favour of the petitioner on 17.02.2020 mentioning that the petitioner is ready to pay the requisite amount as and when directed. Upon receipt of application of the petitioner, Respondent No. 3 issued memo of proclamation calling objection on the settlement of the land subject matter of application and further issued notice in the newspaper dated 22.06.2020. However, no objection was received on the application submitted by the petitioner for allotment of the land. The Respondent authority in contravention of the circular/guidelines dated 11.09.2019 had started the proceedings of auction of the land which is subject matter of application submitted by the petitioner for settlement without giving any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Petitioner thereafter, submitted an application before the Respondent No. 3 with a prayer to suspend the auction proceedings which was not considered and decided. Accordingly, the writ petition is filed.

¶31

He contended that the auction proceedings can be initiated when there is more than one claim on the land as per the circular dated 11.09.2019 (Annexure P/2). He submits that in the facts of the case, the auction proceedings initiated by the Respondent No. 3 be set-aside and direction be issued to the Respondent No. 3 in light of the notification dated 11.09.2019 to consider and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for settlement of the land subject matter of writ petition.

¶32

On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that reply has not been filed to the writ petition, however, he submits that the circular based on which, petitioner is claiming right and has filed writ petition, seeking the relief as mentioned therein, has been withdrawn by issuing other subsequent circular dated 23.07.2024 and

¶33

4

¶34

therefore, petitioner would not be entitle for the reliefs as sought for in the writ petition.

¶35

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record.

¶36

From perusal of the pleadings made in the writ petition and the relief clause, it is apparent that the petitioner is claiming the relief based on the circular issued by the State Government dated 11.09.2019 which provides for the allotment/settlement of the government land possessed by the person. The State Government vide circular dated 23.07.2024 has been canceled the circular dated 11.09.2019.

¶37

In the aforementioned facts of the case, where the circular based upon which, the petitioner is claiming his right to get relief is not in existence as it has been canceled, no relief as prayed for can be granted now. The circular dated 23.07.2024 is extracted below for ready reference:-

¶38

छቈኍ�सगढ़ शा�सन रा�जस्व एव� आपदा� ्ቚबं�धन विवभा�ग मቔኋ�लय महा�नदा� भावन, नव� रा�यप�रा, अटलनगरा E-mail- revenue.cgagov.in, दूराभा�ष 0771 2510994

¶39

म��क एफ़ -4-14 /स�त -1/2024 नव� रा�यप�रा दिदान�क 23 JUL 2024

¶40

समस्त आय�क) छቈኍ�सगढ़

¶41

समस्त कल*क्टरा छቈኍ�सगढ़

¶42

विवषय : नगरा�य ቌኔቔኋ- म. शा�सक/य भा0मिम क आबं�टन / वቝኋ�पन / ቛኍ/हा5्ቓ क* सबं�ध म ज�रा� परिरापቔኋ5 / विनदा8शा- क5 विनरास्त करान* बं�बंत)।

¶43

सदाभा: इस विवभा�ग क* परिरापቔኋ कम�क एफ-4-07/स�त-1/2019 दिदान�क 11.09.2019, 26.10.2019, 20.05.2020 एव 24.02.2022

¶44

सन्दाቝኌभा?त पቔኋ- क� क@ पय� अवल5कन करा.।

¶45

इस विवभा�ग ቛኋ�रा� ज�रा� परिरापቔኋ कम��क एफ-4-07/ स�त-1/2019 दिदान�क 11.09.2019, 26.10.2019, 20.05.2020 एव 24.02.2022 जिजसम* नगरा�य ቌኔቔኋ5 म. शा�सक/य भा0मिम क आबंटन अवित्ቅमिमत भा0मिम क* ्ቤ वቝኋ�पन एव� भा0मिमस्व�म� हाक ्ቚदा�न करान* सबंध� विनदा8शा परिरापቔኋ5 ज�रा� विकय� गय� हाC।

¶46

5

¶47

रा�ज्य शा�सन, एतቛኋ�रा�, नगरा�य ቌኔቔኋ- म. शा�सक/य भा0मिम क आबं�टन, अवित्ቅमिमत भा0मिम क� ्ቤ वቝኋ�पन एव� भा0मिमस्व�म� हाक ्ቚदा�न करान* स�बं�ध� प0व: म. ज�रा� स�दाቝኌभा?त विनदा8शा / परिरापቔኋ- क5 विनरास्त करात� हाC।

¶48

सभा� जिजल� कलक्टरा क5 विनदा8शिशात विकय� ज�त� हाC विक उपरा5क्त परिरापቔኋ5 / आदाशा5 क* अतग:त आबं�दिटत / ቝኋ�विपत / ቛኍ/हा5्ቓ क/ गई भा0मिम क/ ज�नक�रा� स�लग्न ्ቚपቔኋ म. जिजल� क* वबंस�ईट परा ्ቚदाቦኌशा?त करा., एव� विवभा�ग�य वबंस�ईट परा ्ቚदाቦኌशा?त करान* हात� ज�नक�रा� क/ सJफटक�प� (Excel) एव� जिजल� कलक्टरा ቛኋ�रा� हास्त�ቌኔरिरात ्ቚवित (PDI) विवभा�ग�य ई-मल परा तत्क�ल ्ቚविषत करा.। भा0मिम क* आबं�टन/ वቝኋ�पन / फ/हा5्ቓ क* विवषय म. क5ई आपቈኌቈኍ / शिशाक�यत ्ቚ�प्त हा5न* परा स�भा�ग�य आय�क्त ቛኋ�रा� स�नव�ई क/ ज� सक* ग�। सलग्न ्ቚपቔኋ 1,2,3.

¶49

(अविवन�शा चቘኋ�वत) सशिचव छቈኍ�सगढ़ शा�सन रा�जस्व एव� आपदा� ्ቚबं�धन विवभा�ग

¶50

In the aforementioned facts of the case, in the opinion of this Court, no relief as prayed for by the petitioner can be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition being devoid of merit, is liable to be and is accordingly, dismissed . Certified copy as per rules.

¶51

Digitally
SHUBHAM signed by
DEY SHUBHAM
DEY

¶52

Sd/-Sd/-- /-/--------/--/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Judge

¶53

Dey

Mahabir Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahabir Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dr. Akash Pradeep Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Sheikh Sadik Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajju Kumar Bhoi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramesh Udde Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhushan Kumar Khobragade Vs Union of India

Smt. Santola Singh Vs Vikram Singh