Dismissed¶35

Sushila Devi v. Ram Bai

Chhattisgarh HC20 Jul 2026WP227/991/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur; WP227 No. 991 of 2025; single-judge order dated 21/07/2026 by Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution owing to complete non-appearance of petitioners despite repeated calls. Petitioners: Sushila Devi, Shyam Bai, Rajkumar, Lala Kumar (heirs of Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya). Respondents: Ram Bai, Lalita, Anita, Lalit, Ushabai, Baijnath, Gulbiya Devi, Jilbiiya Devi, Roopnarayan Patel, Jitendra Singh, Deepak Agrawal, Bimla Devi, State of Chhattisgarh (Collector, Raigarh), Rajesh Kumar Sharma. Counsel: none for petitioners; Mr. Rohan Shukla, PL for Respondent/State. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no issues framed, no holdings, no monetary amounts.

What the court decided

Sushila Devi Vs Ram Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010410352025

2026:CGHC:31075

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WP227 No. 991 of 2025

¶7

1 - Sushila Devi Wd/o Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya Aged About 68 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶8

2 - Shyam Bai D/o Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya, W/o Sanjay Dash Aged About 44 Years R/o Village - Jhagarha, Police Station - Amlai, Tehsil - Budhar, District - Shahdol (M.P.)

¶9

3 - Rajkumar S/o Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya, Aged About 46 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶10

4 - Lala Kumar S/o Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya Aged About 42 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶11

... Petitioner(s)

¶12

versus

¶13

1 - Ram Bai D/o Late Mahesh Prasad Kanaujiya, W/o Krishnanad Mishra, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village - Sector 07, Shop No. 32, Post, Police Station, Tehsil And District - Durg (C.G.)

¶14

2 - Lalita D/o Late Ramchandra Kanaujiya, W/o Pramod Das, Aged About 29 Years R/o Kumharpara, Near Baba Talab, Rajgangpur, Post - Rajgangpur, District - Sudergarh (Odisha)

¶15

Digitally signed by SUGUNA SUGUNA DUBEY DUBEY Date:2026.07.22 14:21:45 +0530

¶16

¶17

3 - Anita D/o Late Ramchandra Kanaujiya, W/o Kumod, Aged About 25 Years R/o Gharghoda, Police Station And Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶18

4 - Lalit S/o Late Ramchandra Kanaujiya Aged About 27 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶19

5 - Ushabai W/o Late Ramchandra Kanaujiya Aged About 49 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶20

6 - Baijnath S/o Late Singeshwar Prasad Aged About 55 Years R/o Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶21

7 - Smt. Gulbiya Devi D/o Late Dukharan Das Aged About 82 Years R/o Colony - Dumri, District - Patna (Bihar)

¶22

8 - Jilbiiya Devi D/o Late Dukharan Das Aged About 77 Years R/o Colony - Mohammadpur, District - Patna (Bihar)

¶23

9 - Roopnarayan Patel S/o Mahingal Patel Aged About 56 Years R/o Village - Kasiya, Ward No. 01, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶24

10 - Jitendra Singh S/o Late Godu Singh Aged About 46 Years Occupation - Business, R/o Jaistambh Chowk, Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶25

11 - Deepak Agrawal S/o Chandrabhan Agrawal Aged About 61 Years Occupation - Business, R/o Kotra Road, Raigarh, Tehsil And District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶26

12 - Bimla Devi W/o Santosh Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Gharghoda, Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶27

¶28

13 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Collector, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶29

14 - Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Ramwatar Aged About 50 Years Caste - Brahmin, Occupation - Hotel Business (Rupa Restaurant), R/o Hanuman Chowk, Gharghoda, Police Station And Tehsil - Gharghoda, District - Raigarh (C.G.)

¶30

... Respondent(s)

¶31

For Petitioner(s)	: Nonepresent
For Respondent/State	: Mr. Rohan Shukla, PL

¶32

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)

¶33

Order on Board

¶34

21/07/2026

¶35

Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation is made even after repeated calls, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶36

Sd/-

¶37

(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)

¶38

Judge

Sushila Devi v. Ram Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sushila Devi v. Ram Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. K. Gupta Alias Raj Kishor Gupta Vs Smt. Uma Banchhor

Ashutosh Singh Alias Ashutosh Singh Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

In the Matter of Suo Moto Public Interest Litigattion, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shyam Lal Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jagjivan Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ibrar Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh