Dismissed¶¶28

Smt. Aparna Tripathi v. Anand Tripathi

Chhattisgarh HC20 Jul 2026WP227/675/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; single-judge order dated 21/07/2026 by Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:31074; NAFR. WP227 Nos. 675 and 764 of 2022, involving the Tripathi family members (petitioners Smt. Aparna Tripathi, Ku. Kandisha Tripathi and Abhishek Tripathi; respondents Anand Tripathi, Smt. Snehlata Tripathi and Smt. Aparna Tripathi), dismissed for want of prosecution due to complete non-appearance and non-representation on repeated calls. No statute or precedent cited, no issue framed, no merits decided; of no citable value on any legal proposition.

What did the court decide?

As no one appeared on behalf of the parties on repeated calls and no representation was made, both writ petitions (WP227 No. 675 of 2022 and WP227 No. 764 of 2022) stand dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶¶28

Smt. Aparna Tripathi Vs Anand Tripathi — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010355592022

2026:CGHC:31074

NAFR

Digitally SUMITKUMAR signedbySUMIT KUMAR

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WP227 No. 675 of 2022

¶8

1 - Smt. Aparna Tripathi D/o Shri Ram Milan Mishra, W/o Shri Abhishek Tripathi, Aged About 40 Years R/o B-14, Avinash New County (Incorrectly Referred To As Founty In The Impugned Order), Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chahttisgarh. Additional Address-Aparna Mishra, Principal, Krishna Public School, Sarona, Indraprast Colony, Ring Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

2 - Ku. Kandisha Tripathi, D/o Shri Abhishek Tripathi Aged About 5 Years And Smt. Aparna Tripathi, Through Her Natural Guardian Mother, Smt. Aparna Tripathi, D/o Shri Ram Milan Mishra, W/o Shri Abhishek Tripathi, Aged About 40 Years. R/o B-14, Avinash New County (Incorrectly Referred To As Founty In The Impugned Order), Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chahttisgarh. Additional Address-Aparna Mishra, Principal, Krishna Public School, Sarona, Indraprast Colony, Ring Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

--- Petitioner(s)

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - Anand Tripathi S/o Late Shri Poharisharan Tripath, Aged About 66 Years R/o 77/14, Nehru Nagar, East Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶13

2 - Smt. Snehlata Tripathi, W/o Shri Anand Tripathi, Aged About 64 Years R/o 77/14, Nehru Nagar, East Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶14

--- Respondent(s)

¶15

WP227 No. 764 of 2022

¶16

Abhishek Tripathi S/o Shri Anand Kumar Tripathi Aged About 40 Years R/o A- 203, Amaltash Moulshree Vihar, V.I.P. Road, Police Station Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶17

--- Petitioner(s)

¶18

Versus

¶19

¶20

Smt. Aparna Tripathi W/o Abhishek Tripathi Aged About 39 Years R/o Avinash Count, Sector-30, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), Other Address Work Place Aparna Tripathi, Principal, Krishna Public School, Indraprastha Colony, Sarona, Raipur (C.G.)

¶21

--- Respondent(s)

¶22

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶23

For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None

¶24

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.)

¶25

Order on Board

¶26

21/07/2026

¶27

None for the petitioners on repeated calls and no representation is made.

¶28

Since no one appears on behalf of the parties on repeated calls and no representation is made, the writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶29

Sd/(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE

¶30

Sumit

Smt. Aparna Tripathi v. Anand Tripathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Aparna Tripathi v. Anand Tripathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. K. Gupta Alias Raj Kishor Gupta Vs Smt. Uma Banchhor

Ashutosh Singh Alias Ashutosh Singh Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

In the Matter of Suo Moto Public Interest Litigattion, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shyam Lal Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jagjivan Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ibrar Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh