Dismissed¶30

Baisakhiya Bai v. Ramin Bai Mathur

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jul 2026WP227/1070/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WP227 No. 1070 of 2025; dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn; IA No.05/2026 application for withdrawal; amicable settlement between parties; petitioners appeared in person with affidavits; affidavits of aged petitioners No.1 Baisakhiya Bai and No.2(g) Sanjay verified by co-petitioners; liberty to repeat prayer if cause of action arises; order dated 15/07/2026; single-judge order by Ravindra Kumar Agrawal; Richa Sharma Panel Lawyer for the State; no statutory or precedent citations; no impugned order discussed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on application IA No.05/2026, the parties having settled their dispute amicably; liberty reserved to repeat the prayer if the cause of action further arises. ¶30

Baisakhiya Bai Vs Ramin Bai Mathur — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

CGHC010452662025

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WP227 No. 1070 of 2025

¶5

1 - Baisakhiya Bai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 81 Years W/o Itwari Ram, R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶6

2 - Devmati (Dead) Through Legal Heirs Nil

¶7

2. - (A) Dhaniram S/o Brijlal Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶8

2. - (B) Kaliram S/o Brijlal Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶9

2.- (C) Sravan S/o Brijlal Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶10

2. - (D) Kailash S/o Brijlal Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶11

2.- (E) Suhaga D/o Brijlal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶12

2. - (F) Gulapa D/o Brijlal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.) 2. - (G) Sanjay S/o Late Baliram Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶13

3 - Ganeshiya Bai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 71 Years W/o Itwari Ram, R/o Lofandi, Tehsil And Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

4 - Siyabai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 67 Years W/o Phaguwa, R/o Khurdar (Pipartrai), Tehsil Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶15

... Petitioner(s)

¶16

versus

¶17

1 - Ramin Bai Mathur D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 54 Years W/o Dayal Das, R/o Village Goindra, Tehsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶18

2 - Rambai Khande D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 49 Years W/o Janak Ram, R/o Village Nevra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶19

3 - Saambai Sonwani D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 47 Years W/o Sahoran Sonwani, R/o Village Kuan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Pramila Bai Banjare D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 43 Years W/o Harishankar, R/o Village Narotikapa (Lamer), Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Ranjana Bai Bhardwaj D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 42 Years W/o Rajkumar, R/o Village Amora, Tehsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶20

6 - Ganesh Ram (Dead) Through Legal Heirs Nil

¶21

(A) Ramavtar Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 52 Years R/o Village

¶22

¶23

Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶24

(B) Rameshwar Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶25

(C) Ramashanker Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶26

(D) Kailash Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶27

7 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Defendant No. 6)

¶28

... Respondent(s)

¶29

Order Sheet

¶30

15/07/2026	Shri Dhaniram, Shri Kaliram, Shri Sravan, Shri Kailash, Ms.
inder	Suhaga, Ms. Gulapa (Petitioners No.2(a) to 2(f), Ganeshiya Bai, Siyabai (petitioner No.3&4) are present in person. Ms. Richa Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard on IA No.05/2026 which is an application for withdrawal of the present writ petition. In support of application for withdrawal of writ petition, the petitioners have filed their affidavit, however, due to old age, the petitioner No.1-Baisakhiya Bai and petitioner No.2(g)-Sanjay could not appear before this court in person, however, their affidavit have been verified by the other petitioners who are present in person today before the court. The petitioners in person who are present before this court today would submit that since the parties have settled their dispute amicably, now they do not want to press this petition any further. In view of submissions made by the petitioners in person and considering affidavits filed by them, including the affidavits of petitioner No.1-Baisakhiya Bai and petitioner No.2(g)-Sanjay, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties are at liberty to repeat their prayer, if cause of action further arises. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

15/07/2026

Shri Dhaniram, Shri Kaliram, Shri Sravan, Shri Kailash, Ms.

inder

Suhaga, Ms. Gulapa (Petitioners No.2(a) to 2(f), Ganeshiya Bai,
Siyabai (petitioner No.3&4) are present in person.
Ms. Richa Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Heard on IA No.05/2026 which is an application for
withdrawal of the present writ petition. In support of application for
withdrawal of writ petition, the petitioners have filed their affidavit,
however, due to old age, the petitioner No.1-Baisakhiya Bai and
petitioner No.2(g)-Sanjay could not appear before this court in
person, however, their affidavit have been verified by the other
petitioners who are present in person today before the court.
The petitioners in person who are present before this court
today would submit that since the parties have settled their dispute
amicably, now they do not want to press this petition any further.
In view of submissions made by the petitioners in person and
considering affidavits filed by them, including the affidavits of
petitioner No.1-Baisakhiya Bai and petitioner No.2(g)-Sanjay, the
present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
The parties are at liberty to repeat their prayer, if cause of
action further arises.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge

¶31

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Baisakhiya Bai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 81 Years W/o Itwari Ram, R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶5
petitioner
Devmati (Dead) Through Legal Heirs Nil¶6
petitioner
Dhaniram S/o Brijlal Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶7
petitioner
Kaliram S/o Brijlal Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶8
petitioner
Sravan S/o Brijlal Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶9
petitioner
Kailash S/o Brijlal Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶10
petitioner
Suhaga D/o Brijlal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶11
petitioner
Gulapa D/o Brijlal Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶12
petitioner
Sanjay S/o Late Baliram Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Goindra, Tahsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶12
petitioner
Ganeshiya Bai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 71 Years W/o Itwari Ram, R/o Lofandi, Tehsil And Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)¶13
petitioner
Siyabai D/o Late Jethuram Aged About 67 Years W/o Phaguwa, R/o Khurdar (Pipartrai), Tehsil Kota, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)¶14
respondent
Ramin Bai Mathur D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 54 Years W/o Dayal Das, R/o Village Goindra, Tehsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶17
respondent
Rambai Khande D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 49 Years W/o Janak Ram, R/o Village Nevra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶18
respondent
Saambai Sonwani D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 47 Years W/o Sahoran Sonwani, R/o Village Kuan, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶19
respondent
Pramila Bai Banjare D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 43 Years W/o Harishankar, R/o Village Narotikapa (Lamer), Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶19
respondent
Ranjana Bai Bhardwaj D/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 42 Years W/o Rajkumar, R/o Village Amora, Tehsil Patharia, District Mungeli (C.G.)¶19
respondent
Ganesh Ram (Dead) Through Legal Heirs Nil¶20
respondent
Ramavtar Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 52 Years R/o Village¶21
respondent
Rameshwar Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶24
respondent
Ramashanker Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶25
respondent
Kailash Baghel S/o Late Ganesh Ram R/o Village Peepartrai, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.)¶26
respondent
The State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Defendant No. 6)¶27
Richa Sharma

Coram

AI extract

Ravindra Kumar Agrawalauthor¶30

Baisakhiya Bai v. Ramin Bai Mathur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baisakhiya Bai v. Ramin Bai Mathur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aatmaram Bhoyar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Desiya Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Yogesh Kumar Sahu Vs the High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Chier Engineer Public Works Department Vs Guruwari

M/S. Menakshi Con Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited (S E C L)

Rishabh Berisal Vs State of Chhattisgarh