Disposed¶23

Ramdayal v. Mangli Bai

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jan 2026SA/65/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

SA No. 65 of 2017, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 15/01/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Ramdayal (appellant/Defendant No.1) v. Mangli Bai (Respondent No.1/Plaintiff) and State of Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.2). Abatement of second appeal: sole appellant died 21/12/2022, no LRs brought on record within limitation, respondent No.1 also died; appeal stands abated. Section 100 CPC; impugned decree of District Judge, Jashpur dated 05.11.2016 in Civil Appeal No.02-A/2016; trial decree of Civil Judge, Class-II, Baghicha dated 14.12.2015 in Civil Case No. 07-A/2013; Anand Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State; no one for appellant.

What did the court decide?

No relief; the Second Appeal stands abated on account of the death of the sole appellant and non-substitution of legal representatives. ¶23

Ramdayal Vs Mangli Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

NAFR

SOURABH BHILWAR

2026:CGHC:2502

Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.01.15 17:56:21 +0530

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

SA No. 65 of 2017

¶8

Ramdayal S/o Sukhdev, Aged About 80 Years Caste- Cheek, VillageRengola, Tahsil Baghicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ..…... Defendant No.1

¶9

... Appellant versus

¶10

1 - Mangli Bai D/o Jadunath, Aged About 80 Years Village- Rengola, Tahsil Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Village Bilaitanger, Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ......Plaintiff

¶11

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh……... Defendant No.2

¶12

.... Respondents

¶13

(Cause title is taken from CIS)

¶14

For Appellant : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru, Order on Board

¶16

15/01/2026

¶17

The present Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing the judgment and decree dated 05.11.2016 passed by the learned District Judge, Jashpur in

¶18

¶19

Civil Appeal No.02-A/2016, arising out of the judgment and decree dated 14.12.2015 passed by the Civil Judge, Class-II, Baghicha, Distt.Jashpur in Civil Case No. 07-A/2013.

¶20

At the very outset, it has been observed by this Court that vide order dated 03/09/2025, a fixed date SPC was issued to the appellant as no one appeared on his behalf. As per Office report dated 14/10/2025, the SPC issued to the appellant was awaited, therefore, in the meantime, vide order dated 16/10/2025, a fresh fixed date SPC was issued for his appearance before this Court. However, as per Office report dated 29/10/2025, it has been reported that the sole appellant has died on 21/12/2022.

¶21

It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that during the pendency of the appeal, respondent No.1 has also died.

¶22

None appears nor any representation has been made on behalf of the appellant to prosecute the appeal, no legal representatives of the deceased appellant have been brought on record, nor has any application for bringing the legal representatives been filed within the prescribed period of limitation, and respondent No.1 has also died.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid facts, the present Second Appeal stands abated .

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶26

$. Bhilwar

Ramdayal v. Mangli Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramdayal v. Mangli Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sheela Dubey and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Nemsingh Vs Gondiya Bai

Shyamkumar And Ors. Vs Moolchand And Ors.

Suresh Kumar Hemnani (Died) through Lrs. Vs Mohan

Nanhu Rathore Vs Vishnu Prasad Rathore

Milandas Satnami Vs Ankalha and Anr.