Shyamkumar And Ors. v. Moolchand And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SA No. 217 of 2014, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 14/01/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Appellants: Shyamkumar, Rajkumar, Rajkumari, Bhuri Bai (vs Moolchand, Tej Lal, Bhushan Lal, Tosh Kumar, Dolenth Kumar, State of Chhattisgarh). Dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellant's counsel; no merits decided; no statutory provisions or case law cited; no costs or monetary quantum awarded. Counsel: Malay Jain, P.L. for Respondent/State; none for appellants.
What did the court decide?
As no one appeared for the appellant despite repeated calls, the Court had no option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution; no adjudication on merits. ¶¶25