Shambhu v. a) Ramprakash
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal SA No. 392 of 2018, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Hon'ble Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge), decided 13/04/2026 and signed digitally by JYOTI SHARMA: appeal by Shambhu against Ramprakash, Bilaso, Manmati, Bimli, Sangita, Amani, Tilakdhari, Bedilal, Meera Devi (and minor children Omkar, Sumeshwar, Vindhali, Janki, Jyoti) and the State of Chhattisgarh (Collector, Surajpur) DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION — no appearance for the appellant on repeated calls; counsel for the State was Mr. Santosh Soni, P.L. (respondent No. 5). Marked NAFR. Procedural disposal only: no holdings, no issues framed, no statutory or precedent citations, no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
None; the second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution on account of non-appearance for the appellant despite repeated calls. ¶33