Dismissed¶¶34

Bhuvneshwar v. Fagulal

Chhattisgarh HC26 Jan 2026SA/378/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeals; dismissal as withdrawn; appellants not interested in prosecuting appeals; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; SA No. 378 of 2016; SA No. 379 of 2016; Raigarh; Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge; order dated 27.01.2026; NAFR; no merits adjudication; no precedent value.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of both appeals permitted; both appeals dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellants. ¶¶34

Why is it important?

Bhuvneshwar Vs Fagulal — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:4289

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

SA No. 378 of 2016

¶6

1 - Bhuvneshwar S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 65 Years R/o- Caste Aghariya, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o- Village- Charbhanta, Tahsil And DistrictRaigarh, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶7

2 - Damodar, S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 45 Years R/o- Caste Aghariya, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o- Village- Charbhanta, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Digitally signed bySHOAIB SHOAIB ANWAR ANWAR Date:2026.01.27 15:54:14 +0530

¶9

3 - Balmati, D/o Jagmohan, Aged About 52 Years R/o- Caste Aghariya, Occupation- Cultivator, R/o- Village- Charbhanta, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh,......Plainti+s, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶10

--- Appellants

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - Fagulal S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 67 Years Caste Aghariya, Occupation- Cultivator And Retired Teacher, R/o- Village-

¶13

¶14

Charbhanta, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶15

2 - Deleted Manbodh Tigga As Per Honble Court Order Dated 04.07.2017, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶16

3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh,..........Defendants, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶17

--- Respondent(s)

¶18

SA No. 379 of 2016

¶19

1 - Bhuvneshwar S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Charbhanta, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶20

2 - Damodar, S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Charbhanta, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh..........Plainti+s , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶21

-- Appellants

¶22

Versus

¶23

1 - Fagulal S/o Jagmohan, Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Devri, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh

¶24

2 - Deleted Manbodh Tigga As Per Honble Court Order Dated 04.07.2017, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶25

¶26

3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.....Defendants , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

¶27

--- Respondent(s)

¶28

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶29

For Appellants : Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer.

¶30

Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶31

Order on Board

¶32

27.01.2026

¶33

On instructions, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeals and prays for withdrawal of the same.

¶34

Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶37

Shoaib

Bhuvneshwar v. Fagulal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Bhuvneshwar v. Fagulal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Dubey Vs Krishna Kant Dubey, Alias K.K. Dubey (Died) Through Lrs.

Madhusudan Majumdar Vs Jagdish Sarkar

Singhal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Subhashish Shaha

Sumit Panika Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lalit Ganvir Vs Central Bureau of Investigation CBI

Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Vs Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu