Disposed¶46

Rameshvar Prasad Sahu v. Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu

Chhattisgarh HC26 Jan 2026SA/366/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; order dated 27/01/2026; cross second appeals SA No. 366 of 2020 and SA No. 27 of 2020 under Section 100 CPC between Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu and Rameshwar/Rameshvar Prasad Sahu and family (Bilaspur/Mungeli); both appeals disposed of in terms of mediation compromise deed dated 22/07/2025 following referral order dated 10.07.2025; compromise deed made part of judgment; decree directed; no merits adjudication; relevant to settlement/mediation-based disposal of second appeals.

What did the court decide?

Both appeals disposed of in terms of the mediation compromise deed dated 22/07/2025; the deed forms part of the judgment and a decree is to be drawn accordingly. ¶46

Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Vs Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:4385

NAFR

AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.01.27 17:47:56 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

SA No. 366 of 2020

¶7

1 - Rameshvar Prasad Sahu S/o Late Shobharam Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - Upendra Kumar @ Barsati Sahu S/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

3 - Bhupendra Kumar @ Umesh @ Munchu Sahu S/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

4 - Ramkunwar @ Mankunwar Sahu W/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

... Appellants

¶12

versus

¶13

1 - Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu W/o Parasram Sahu Aged About 68 Years R/o Puja Building, Amala Chowk Barela Tahsil Mungeli Then District Bilaspur, Now District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur, Now Collector Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶15

	... Respondent(s)
For Appellants	: Shri Suresh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 1	: Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate
For Respondent/State	: Shri Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A.

¶16

¶17

SA No. 27 of 2020

¶18

Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu D/o Shobharam Sahu Aged About 68 Years W/o Parasram Sahu, R/o Pooja Building, Amha Chowk, Barela, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶19

... Appellant

¶20

versus

¶21

1 - Rameshwar Prasad S/o Shobharam Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶22

2 - Upendra Kumar @ Barsati S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶23

3 - Bhupendra Kumar @ Ramesh @ Munyu S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

4 - Smt. Ramkunwar @ Mankunwar W/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶25

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶26

... Respondent(s)

¶27

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶28

For Appellant : Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Suresh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

27/01/2026

1. By the appeal i.e. SA No.366 of 2020 under Section 100 of the CPC, the appellants/defendants challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 08/11/2019 passed by the learned 6^th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Appeal No.55-A/2019 (Rameshwar Prasad & Ors Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai & Anr) arising out of the judgment dated 16/01/2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge Class-II, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.30A/11 (Smt. Kanti Bai Vs. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors). For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred as per their status before the learned trial Court.

¶33

2. By the appeal i.e. SA No.27 of 2020 under Section 100 of the CPC, the appellant/plaintiff challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 08/11/2019 passed by the learned 6^th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Appeal No.55-A/2019 (Rameshwar Prasad & Ors Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai & Anr) arising out of the judgment dated 16/01/2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge Class-II, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.30A/11 (Smt. Kanti Bai Vs. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors). For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred as per their status before the learned trial Court.

¶34

3. Pursuant to the order dated 10.07.2025, these matters were referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court. As per the mediation report dated 22.07.2025 , the parties appeared before

¶35

¶36

the Mediation Centre and the dispute was amicably settled by executing a settlement agreement before the Mediation Centre.

¶37

4. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled and the parties are ready and willing to fulfill the conditions enumerated in the settlement recorded by the Mediation Centre of this Court.

¶38

5. For the sake of convenience the mediation report dated 22.07.2025 is reproduced as under:-

¶39

समझौ�ता�प्ቔ

¶40

यहकि�अपी�ला�ቕኍ�ቦኍ�मती��ती�बा�ईसा�हू��ቛኋ�रा�्ቚ स्ती�तीअकिपीला �. SA No. 27/2020 Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu Vs. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu and Ors. एवं�अपी�ला�ቕኍ�गण रा�म�शवंरा्ቚ सा�दसा�हूएवं�अन्यቛኋ�रा�्ቚ स्ती�तीअपी�ला�. SA No. 366/2020 Rameshwar Prasad Sahu and Ors. Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu and Ors. �! द!ोሪ# ह�अपी�ला�ቕኍ�गण ��ቛኋ�रा�आपीसा�साहमती�एवं�राजा�मद& सा�साम�प्ती�राोሪ��किोሪण(य लिलाय�ह*।

¶41

यहकि�ቦኍ�मती��ती�बा�ईसा�हूजा! �, रा�म�शवंरा्ቚ सा�दसा�हू�, साग�बा़ቡ�बाहोሪह* औरास्वं. श!भा�रा�मसा�हू�, सा�ती�ोሪह*।श!भा�रा�म सा�हू��म0त्य��पीቐኋ�तीद!ोሪ# भा�ई-बाहोሪ (अपी�ला�ቕኍ�गण) �! पीती0� सा�पीቈኍ�जा! कि�ቇኋ�मबा�जा�पी.ह.ोሪ. 8 रा�किोሪमतीखतीपी�रावंतीहसा�ला तीखतीपी�राजिजाला�किबाला�सापी�रा��खसारा�ोሪ. 1819 रा�बा� 0.02 ए�़ቡ , ख.ोሪ�. 149/1 रा�बा� 1.37 ए�़ቡ , ख.ोሪ�. 364 रा�बा� 1.00 ए�़ቡ , ख.ोሪ�. 385 रा�बा� 1.22 ए�़ቡ , ख.ोሪ�. 1423 रा�बा� 0.65 ए�़ቡ , ख.ोሪ�. 1526/2 रा�बा� 0.57 ए�़ቡ , खसारा�ोሪ�बारा 311 रा�बा� 0.206 ह�क्टे�यरा, ख.ोሪ�. 362 ह�क्टे�यरा 0.36 एवं�ख.ोሪ�. 1598 ए�बा� 0.162 ह�क्टे�यरावं�द&/उቈኍरावं�द& �म� ��कितीबा�ई�, पीती0� सा�पीቈኌቈኍह*, जिजासापीराउसा�� 1/4 अ�शह*।उसा�अपीोሪ�भा�ईቦኍ� रा�म�शवंरा्ቚ सा�दसा�हूएवं�उसा��वं�रा�श�ोሪቦኍ�उपी�्ቖ ��म�रासा�हू, ቦኍ� उम�श��म�रासा�हूएवं�ቦኍ�मती�म�ोሪ��वंरासा�हू�!्ቚ द�ोሪ�राअपीोሪ�

¶42

¶43

पीती0�सा�पीቈኍ�सा�्ቚ �प्तीसा�पी<ण( अ�श/किहस्सा��! किबाोሪ�कि�सा�भाय, ला�लाच, एवं�दबा�वं��अपीोሪ�किहस्सा��त्य�ग�राती�ह एवं�अपीोሪ�ቛኋ�रा� स्ती�तीअपी�ला�! म�ोሪोሪ�यन्य�य�लायसा�वं�पीसाला � रा्ቚ �राण साम�प्ती �रा�ग�। उसा�्ቚ ��राअपी�ला�ቕኍ�गणरा�म�शवंरा्ቚ सा�दसा�हूएवं�अन्य��ቛኋ�रा� स्ती�तीअपी�लाउपीरा!क्तीवंቓኌण?तीशती@ �! स्वं��रा�राती�हुएअपी�ला �. SA 366/2020 �! म�ोሪोሪ�यउ्ሴ न्य�य�लायसा�वं�पीसाला � रा �राणसाम�प्ती�राCग�।

¶44

उभायपी्ቌ इसासामझौGती�पी्ቔ �, शती@ सा�साहमतीहI एवं�पी�लाोሪ�� लिलाए�टेबा्ቍ हI �रा�राोሪ�म�मC द& गईशती@ �! उन्ह#ोሪ�अपीोሪ�स्वंय� �, स्वं�ስኋ�पी<वं(�साहमकितीएवं�किबाोሪ�कि�सा�दबा�वं, भायएवं�ला�लाच�� स्वं��राकि�य�गय�ह* उभायपी्ቌ ोሪ�इसा�रा�राोሪ�म��, शती@ �! पीढ़ोሪ� वंसामझौोሪ��पीቐኋ�तीअपीोሪ�स्वंती�्ቔ साहमकितीसा�पीरा्ቢ राए�-दूसारा��, उपीቝኌPकितीमC हस्ती�्ቌरा�राकिोሪष्पी�दिदतीकि�य�।

¶45

6. The disputes between the parties have been settled in mediation by executing a compromise deed. The mediation compromise deed will be a part of the records. In the above circumstances, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the mediation compromise deed dated 22/07/2025. The mediation compromise deed shall form part of the judgment.

¶46

7. A decree be drawn accordingly.

¶47

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶48

Amardeep

Rameshvar Prasad Sahu v. Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rameshvar Prasad Sahu v. Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Dubey Vs Krishna Kant Dubey, Alias K.K. Dubey (Died) Through Lrs.

Madhusudan Majumdar Vs Jagdish Sarkar

Singhal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Subhashish Shaha

Sumit Panika Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhuvneshwar Vs Fagulal

Lalit Ganvir Vs Central Bureau of Investigation CBI