Dismissed¶23
Parsuram v. Ganeshram Sahu
Chhattisgarh HCSA/264/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Procedural dismissal record: High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; SA No. 264 of 2017; appellant Parsuram v. respondents Ganeshram Sahu, Gayaram and The State Of Chhattisgarh; decided 22/04/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Appeal dismissed solely for want of prosecution (non-appearance of appellant's counsel); contains no legal reasoning, statutory references or cited precedents; relevant only as procedural history for the underlying second appeal, not citable for substantive law.
What did the court decide?
Since no representative of the appellant appeared despite repeated calls, the Court held it was left with no option but to dismiss the present second appeal for want of prosecution. ¶19