contend that while dealing with the issue of maintainability of appeal under Section 2(1) of CG High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, against an interlocutory order, the Full Bench of this Court held that though proviso to Section 2(1) of this Act bars appeal against those interim orders which are totally interlocutory in nature, do not decide matters of moment and do not have an element of finality attached to them, but if the order vitally affects rights of the parties having bearing on final adjudication of case, it cannot be termed as interlocutory order and appeal would lie against such order. Further, it was held that appeal would also lie against those orders which cannot be undone at the time of final hearing and which have element of finality attached to them. He submits that in the present case, the order impugned has already attained finality in relation to the respondentABB Ltd. and in consequence thereof, the petitioner has been substituted in place of respondent-ABB Ltd. Thus, the order impugned vitally affects rights of the petitioner having bearing on final adjudication of case. Being so, the objection raised by the Registry deserves to be overruled and the instant review petitions be held to be maintainable.
