Lakshmaneshwar v. Anjana Jangde

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jul 2026REVP/195/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; single judge (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.); REVP No. 195 of 2026; review petition seeking modification of transfer petition order dated 14.05.2026 in TPC No. 172/2025; request for video-conferencing appearance before Family Court, Balodabazar; review refused; liberty given to approach Family Court under High Court-framed rules; matrimonial dispute between husband (Laxmaneshwar Prasad Jangde) and wife (Anjana Jangde); relevant to mode-of-appearance/video-conferencing applications and limits of review of prior orders; decided 15/07/2026.

What did the court decide?

No review or modification of the order dated 14.05.2026; liberty granted to the petitioner to apply to the Family Court, Balodabazar for permission to appear through Video Conferencing. ¶¶20

Lakshmaneshwar Vs Anjana Jangde — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No review or modification of the order dated 14.05.2026; liberty granted to the petitioner to apply to the Family Court, Balodabazar for permission to appear through Video Conferencing.

¶¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether the Review Petition seeking modification of the order dated 14.05.2026 passed in Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 172/2025 — so as to permit the petitioner/husband to appear before the learned Family Court, Balodabazar through Video Conferencing — should be entertained and allowed.

¶¶17

Court's answer

Having considered the purpose of the Review Petition, this Court is not inclined to review or modify the order dated 14.05.2026 passed in TPC No. 172/2025.

¶¶18

Ratio / Principle

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Family Court, Balodabazar, seeking permission to appear through Video Conferencing.

¶¶19

Key takeaways

If such an application is filed, the concerned Family Court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with the rules framed by the High Court.ratio¶¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Review Petition (REVP No. 195 of 2026) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi), filed by the husband seeking modification of this Court's order dated 14.05.2026 in Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 172/2025 (Anjana Jangde Vs. Lakshamaneshwar Prasad Jangde), so as to permit him to appear before the learned Family Court, Balodabazar through Video Conferencing. Held: having considered the purpose of the Review Petition, the Court was not inclined to review or modify the order dated 14.05.2026; however, liberty was granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Family Court, Balodabazar seeking permission to appear through Video Conferencing, and if such application is filed the Family Court shall consider and decide it in accordance with the rules framed by the High Court. Review Petition stood disposed of (15.07.2026).

¶1

¶2

CGHC010226982026 2026:CGHC:29841

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

REVP No. 195 of 2026

¶6

Lakshmaneshwar S/o Late Saheb Lal Jangde Aged About 38 Years (Wrongly Typed Correct Name Is Laxmaneshwar Prasad Jangde) R/o Village - Korbi Tahsil - Baloda District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) At Present Address- Shalom Villa, Sector - D Road Near Muktidham Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra P.S. Sirgitti Digitally District- Bilaspur (C.G.) signed by AJAY KUMAR ... Petitioner. DWIVEDI Date: Versus 2026.07.15 16:29:54 Anjana Jangde W/o Lakshamaneshwar Aged About 32 Years (Wrongly Typed +0530

¶7

Anjana Jangde W/o Lakshamaneshwar Aged About 32 Years (Wrongly Typed Correct Name Is Laxmaneshwar Prasad Jangde D/o Raj Narayan Gahirwar R/o Behind Cold Storage Patpariya Ambikapur District- Sarguja (C.G.) At Present Address- Near Punjab Garden Kamal Colony Balodabazar DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.)

¶8

... Respondent.

¶9

	(cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)
For Petitioner	: Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate.
For Respondent	: None.

¶10

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

15/07/2026

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an advance copy of the review petition has been duly served upon the counsel for the respondent.

¶14

Heard.

¶15

¶16

The present Review Petition has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 14.05.2026 passed by this Court in Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 172/2025 (Anjana Jangde Vs. Lakshamaneshwar Prasad Jangde).

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the modification sought is to permit the petitioner/husband to appear before the learned Family Court, Balodabazar, through Video Conferencing in aforesaid order.

¶18

Having considered the purpose of Review Petition, this Court is not inclined to review or modify the order dated 14.05.2026 passed in TPC No. 172/2025.

¶19

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Family Court, Balodabazar, seeking permission to appear through Video Conferencing. If such an application is filed, the concerned Family Court shall consider and decide the same in accordance with the rules framed by the High Court.

¶20

Accordingly, the Review Petition stands disposed of.

¶21

Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶22

Ajay

Lakshmaneshwar v. Anjana Jangde

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmaneshwar v. Anjana Jangde

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Peri Shivangi Gautami Vs v. Aditya Sharma

Priyvartan Belgahe Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Anjulata Vs Beena Kumari

Ravindra Dongre Vs Ajay Sahu

In Reference of State of Chhattisgarh Vs Bhupendra Vishwakarma

Smt. Maheswari Kurrey Vs Amardas Kurrey