Dismissed¶31

M/S Singhaniya Construction Com. v. Smt. Laxmin Bai

Chhattisgarh HC11 Mar 2026MAC/1308/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court order dated 12/03/2026 dismissing MAC No. 1331 of 2018 and MAC No. 1308 of 2018 for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the appellant M/s Singhaniya Construction Com.; respondents included claimants Smt. Janki Devi, Brihaspatiya Ram, Smt. Laxmin Bai, Babulal Bharti and driver Surjeet Sahu (Roller Engine No. 232801); decided by Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; no arguments advanced, no statute or precedent discussed, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Both appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared on behalf of the appellants even when the matter was called out twice. ¶31

M/S Singhaniya Construction Com. Vs Smt. Laxmin Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:11882

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MAC No. 1331 of 2018

¶6

M/s Singhaniya Construction Com. Through Mohan Singhaniya, S/o Govind Prashad Singhaniya, Aged about 42 Years. R/o G-2 Champa Bhawan Sivaji Park Saddu Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. .............Owner Roller Engine. No. 232801

¶7

--- Appellant(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Smt. Janki Devi W/o W/o Brihaspatiya Ram, Aged About 40 Years

¶10

2 - Brihaspatiya Ram S/o Bhagatram Manhar, Aged About 42 Years

¶11

Both R/o Village Bannakdih, Post and Police Station- Sirgitti Tehsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ................ Non Applicants Claimants

¶12

3 - Surjeet Sahu S/o Bhau Ram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Near Government School Ward No. 10, Palari Thana Palari District Balouda Bazar Chhattisgarh. ...............Driver Roller Engine No. 232801., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶13

--- Respondent(s)

¶14

MAC No. 1308 of 2018

¶15

Digitally signed SHYNA by SHYNA AJAYDN: cn=SHYNAAJAY, AJAY o=PERSONAL,st=Chhattisgarh,c=IN

¶16

M/s Singhaniya Construction Com. Through Mohan Singhaniya S/o Govind Prashad Singhaniya, Aged about 42 years, R/o G-2 Champa Bhawan, Sivaji Park Saddu Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh

---Appellant(s)

Versus

1 - Smt. Laxmin Bai W/o Babulal Bharti, Aged About 50 Years

¶21

2 - Babulal Bharti S/o Late Nakched Bharti, Aged About 55 Years

¶22

Both R/o Village Bannakdih, Post and Police Station Sirgitti Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶23

CLAIMANTS

¶24

3 - Surjeet Sahu, aged about 40 years, S/o Bhau Ram Sahu R/o Village Near Government School Ward No. 10, Palari P.S. Palari, District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh (Driver – Roller engine No.232801)

¶25

--- Respondent(s)

¶26

(Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

¶27

For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None

¶28

S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶29

Order on Board

¶30

12/03/2026

¶31

Since none appears on behalf of the appellants, even when the matter was called out twice, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeals for want of prosecution.

¶32

In view of the above, both the Appeals are dismissed for want of

¶33

prosecution.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)

Judge

Shyna Ajay

({JUDGE_NAME}) JUDGE

¶40

PSName

M/S Singhaniya Construction Com. v. Smt. Laxmin Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Singhaniya Construction Com. v. Smt. Laxmin Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deegendrakant Verma Vs Union of India

Mohd. Sadik Momin Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Local Divisional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Urmila Kumhar

Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Singhaniya Construction Com. Vs Smt. Janki Devi

Bhuwan Singh Vs Shyamlal