Dismissed¶27

Kamini v. Jagat

Chhattisgarh HC1 Feb 2026FA/238/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; First Appeal FA No. 238 of 2025; appellants Kamini, Kevra Bai, Ramin Bai, Jyoti, Rajkumari, Aarti and Bharti (family of late Laakhanlal) versus respondents Jagat, Krishna and State of Chhattisgarh (through Collector, Bilaspur); appeal dismissed for non-prosecution on 02/02/2026 after two calls with no appearance or representation for appellants; bench of Sanjay S. Agrawal and Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ.; keywords: dismissal for non-prosecution, default listing, non-appearance of appellants, no counsel for appellants.

What did the court decide?

In absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, the Court was left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. ¶26

Kamini Vs Jagat — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

FA No. 238 of 2025

¶5

1 - Kamini W/o Santosh D/o Laakhanlal, Aged About 40 Years, Mother Urmila, Resident Of Omnagar, Jarhabhata Bilaspur, Tehsil And DistrictBilaspur , Chhattisgarh.

¶6

PRASHANT DEWANGAN

¶7

Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.02 17:33:16 +0530

¶8

2 - Kevra Bai W/o Laakhanlal, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of VillageJarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶9

3 - Ramin Bai W/o Krishna D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 28 Years , Mother Kevra Bai, Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶10

4 - Jyoti W/o Rajesh D/o Late Laakhanlal, Aged About 26 Years Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶11

5 - Rajkumari W/o Umendra D/o Late Laakhanlal, Aged About 24 Years Mother Kevra Bai, Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶12

6 - Aarti W/o Swaran D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 22 Years Mother Kevra Bai Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶13

7 - Bharti W/o Kamlesh D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 20 Years Mother Kevra Bai Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh,

¶14

... Appellants

¶15

versus

¶16

1 - Jagat S/o Late Fekulal, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Jarhabhata Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶17

¶18

2 - Krishna S/o Late Fekulal Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Jarhabhata Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶19

3 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶20

... Respondents For Appellants : None For State/Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L.

¶21

D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal &

¶22

Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶23

Order on Board

¶24

02/02/2026

¶25

The matter is listed in default(s), yet no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round of hearing.

¶26

In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for nonprosecution.

¶27

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶28

Sd/Sd/(Sanjay S. Agrawal ) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge JUDGE

¶29

Prashant

Kamini v. Jagat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamini v. Jagat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukund Lal Agrawal Vs Gopalchand Mandal (Died) through Lrs

Rajeshwar @ Rajesh Joshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dwarika Ram Dehariya Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Rajesh Yadav And Ors.

Raghuveer Prasad Jharia Vs Union of India

Tarachand Parakh Vs Nemichand Parakh