Dismissed¶28

Hem Bai Sahu v. Kisano Sahu

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jan 2026FA/188/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

FA No. 188 of 2015; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; decided 15.01.2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; appellants Hem Bai Sahu and Yogesh Kumar Sahu absent, represented by none; respondents Kisano Sahu, Badrika Bai, Kanhaiya Lal Sahu, Naneshwari, and State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Baloda Bazar; counsel for respondent(s): Shri Santosh Soni, Govt. Advocate; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution following repeated non-appearance and due service of SPC dated 25.11.2025; no statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared for the appellants despite repeated calls even after the SPC issued vide order dated 25.11.2025 had been duly served. ¶28

Hem Bai Sahu Vs Kisano Sahu — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:2503

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

FA No. 188 of 2015

¶6

Digitally signed bySHOAIB SHOAIB ANWAR ANWAR Date: 2026.01.15 16:46:52 +0530

¶7

1 - Hem Bai Sahu D/o Kisano Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw Post And Revenue Circle In The Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar/bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - Yogesh Kumar Sahu S/o Ghanshyam Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw Post And Revenue Circle In The Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar/bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, Taluka : Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Appellants

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Kisano Sahu S/o Mujnu Sahu Aged About 81 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue District- Baloda Bazar/ Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - Badrika Bai D/o Kisano Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue District- Baloda

¶13

¶14

Bazar/bhatapara, Chhattisgarha, Taluka : Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶15

3 - Kanhaiya Lal Sahu S/o Tijram Sahu Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue District- Baloda Bazar/bhatapara, Chhattisgarha, Taluka : Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶16

4 - Naneshwari W/o Ganeshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bhatgaw, Tahsil Bilaigarh, Civil And Revenue DistrictBaloda Bazar/bhatapara, Chhattisgarha, Taluka : Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶17

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Baloda Bazar, Civil And Revenue District- Baloda Bazar/ Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, Taluka : Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶18

... Respondent(s)

¶19

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶20

For Appellants : None For Respondent(s) : Shri Santosh Soni, Govt. Advocate.

¶21

Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶22

Order on Board

¶23

15.01.2026

¶24

On 17.09.2025, 31.10.2025, and 25.11.2025, none appeared on

¶25

behalf of the appellants, whereupon >xed date SPC were

¶26

¶27

issued to them for their appearance. On 07.01.2026, the appeal was adjourned for hearing today with the observation that the SPC issued to the appellants vide order dated 25.11.2025 had been duly served upon them. However, even today, none appears on behalf of the appellants despite repeated calls.

¶28

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶31

Shoaib

Hem Bai Sahu v. Kisano Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hem Bai Sahu v. Kisano Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sheela Dubey and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Nemsingh Vs Gondiya Bai

Shyamkumar And Ors. Vs Moolchand And Ors.

Suresh Kumar Hemnani (Died) through Lrs. Vs Mohan

Nanhu Rathore Vs Vishnu Prasad Rathore

Milandas Satnami Vs Ankalha and Anr.