Chintaram Yadav v. Smt. Meenabai

Chhattisgarh HC1 Jul 2026CRMP/1709/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Extension of time to file criminal appeal; application under Section 528 BNSS, 2023; limitation/condonation of delay; CRMP No. 1709 of 2026; prior order dated 19.09.2025 in CRMP No. 978/2025 fixing 60-day period; impugned judgment dated 17.01.2025; further 30 days granted; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Radhakishan Agrawal; petitioner Chintaram Yadav; respondent Smt. Meenabai; advocate Keshav Dewangan; NAFR; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:27137.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time: a further period of 30 days from the date of the order (02/07/2026) to file the appeal against the judgment dated 17.01.2025 before the concerned Court; the order was directed to be communicated to the concerned Court forthwith for due compliance. ¶¶20

Chintaram Yadav Vs Smt. Meenabai — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by PRIYANKA PRIYANKA VERMA VERMA Date: 2026.07.02 14:52:41 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:27137

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CRMP No. 1709 of 2026

¶7

Chintaram Yadav S/o Bisesar Yadav Aged About 82 Years R/o Bhagatsingh Ward Dongargarh, Tahsil And Police Station- Dongargarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

Smt. Meenabai W/o Khemu Aged About 51 Years R/o Kandrapara Dongargarh, Police Station- Dongargarh, District: Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶11

	... Respondent
For Petitioner	: Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board

¶13

02/07/2026

¶14

1. This application has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking extension of time.

¶15

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, vide order dated 19.09.2025, CRMP No. 978/2025 was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment dated 17.01.2025 before the appropriate Court within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. He further submits that, due to certain bonafide reasons, the petitioner could not

¶16

¶17

file the appeal within the stipulated period.

¶18

3. On due consideration and the reasons assigned in the present application, this Court deems it appropriate to grant a further period of

¶19