Disposed¶23

Santosh Provision Stores v. Dayalu Sahu

Chhattisgarh HC20 Apr 2026CRMP/1107/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of appeal dismissed for default - Santosh Provision Stores (proprietor Santosh Kumar Sahu) v. Dayalu Sahu; ACQA No.945/2024 restored after dismissal dated 28.08.2025 for want of prosecution, conditioned on Rs.1,000/- deposit with High Court Legal Aid Committee within seven working days; CRMP No. 1107 of 2026 disposed of by single judge (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J.).

What did the court decide?

Restoration of ACQA No.945/2024 to its original number, subject to deposit of Rs.1,000/- before the High Court Legal Aid Committee within seven working days from the date of the order. ¶23

Santosh Provision Stores Vs Dayalu Sahu — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SHUBHAM SINGH SINGH RAGHUVANSHI RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2026.04.22 11:21:14 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:18169

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CRMP No. 1107 of 2026

¶7

Santosh Provision Stores Through Properitor- Santosh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Bhagulal Sahu, Aged About 43 Yrs, R/o Santosh Provision Stores, Near Bus Stand Rajim, P.O. And Police Station- Rajim Tehsil- Rajim, DistrictGariyaband (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

Dayalu Sahu S/o Late Ramnath Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Bhendri, P.O. Lohrsi, Tehsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband (C.G.)

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner	: Mr.	Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent	: Mr.	KK Dewangan

¶13

(Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

21/04/2026

¶16

Heard on admission.

¶17

Admit.

¶18

¶19

Vide order dated 28.08.2025 of this Court, despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court had dismissed ACQA No.945/2024 for want of prosecution.

¶20

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that his nonappearance on 28.08.2025 is bonafide and unintentional. It is prayed by him that ACQA No.945/2024 may be restored to its original number.

¶21

Taking into consideration the submission and cause shown in the application, I am inclined to restore ACQA No.945/2024.

¶22

Prayer for restoration of the appeal is allowed and ACQA No.945/2024 is restored to its original number subject to deposit of Rs.1,000/- before the High Court Legal Aid Committee within seven working days from today.

¶23

Accordingly, the Cr.M.P. stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

Shubham

Santosh Provision Stores v. Dayalu Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Provision Stores v. Dayalu Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditya Kumar Das Vs State of Chhattisgarh

B.L. Gangwani Vs C. Yajulu Rao

Narendra Alias Chhotu Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Abc Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pranay Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh