Disposed¶23

B.L. Gangwani v. C. Yajulu Rao

Chhattisgarh HC19 Apr 2026CRMP/1087/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; CRMP No. 1087 of 2026; B. L. Gangwani v. C. Yajulu Rao; Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal; order dated 20/04/2026; extension of time to deposit cost of Rs. 3,000/- imposed by order dated 10.09.2025 in Acquittal Appeal No. 170/2025; further two weeks' time granted subject to additional cost of Rs. 1,000/-; deposits to DLSA Raipur; other conditions unchanged; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Extension of two weeks from 20.04.2026 to deposit the original cost of Rs. 3,000/- together with an additional cost of Rs. 1,000/-, both to be deposited with the DLSA, Raipur; all other conditions of the order dated 10.09.2025 in ACQA No. 170/2025 remain unchanged. ¶23

B.L. Gangwani Vs C. Yajulu Rao — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally BHOLA signed byBHOLANATH NATH KHATAI KHATAI Date:2026.04.21 14:38:19 +0530

¶3

2026:CGHC:17824

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CRMP No. 1087 of 2026

¶7

B. L. Gangwani S/o Late Shri Waliram Gangwani Aged About 70 Years R/o House No. U-3, Shivaji Park, Avanti Vihar, Police Station Telibandha, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

C. Yajulu Rao S/o Late Shri Jagannath Rao R/o House No. 27/191 New Shanti Nagar, Police Station Civil Line Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

... Respondent(s)

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent : None

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

20/04/2026

¶16

1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner seeking an extension of time to deposit the cost of ₹3,000/-.

¶17

2. Vide order dated 10.09.2025, while allowing Acquittal Appeal No. 170/2025, this Court imposed a cost of ₹3,000/- upon the petitioner/appellant. The said amount was to be deposited before the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Raipur, within a period of two weeks. However, the petitioner failed to deposit the

¶18

¶19

amount within the stipulated timeframe. Consequently, this petition has been moved for an extension.

¶20

3. Taking into consideration the reasons assigned in the petition, this Court deems it appropriate to grant an extension of time. Accordingly, the time for depositing the original cost of ₹3,000/- is hereby extended for a further period of two weeks from today subject to the payment of an additional cost of ₹1,000/-, to be deposited with the DLSA, Raipur.

¶21

4. The petitioner is directed to deposit both the original cost (₹3,000/-) and the additional cost (₹1,000/-) within the aforementioned extended period.

¶22

5. All other conditions stipulated in the order dated 10.09.2025, passed in ACQA No. 170/2025, shall remain unchanged.

¶23

6. With the aforesaid directions, this CRMP stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/- ( Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE

¶25

Khatai

B.L. Gangwani v. C. Yajulu Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.L. Gangwani v. C. Yajulu Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Markam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Premsingh Rawat Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mohan Satankar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aditya Kumar Das Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Narendra Alias Chhotu Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh