Shivchand Bariha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Jan 2026CRA/1374/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRA No. 1374 of 2018; Shivchand Bariha v. State of Chhattisgarh; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; 2026:CGHC:1017; hearing 07/01/2026; no appearance for appellant in second round call; appellant had completed sentence and released from jail; Mr. Ajeet Yadav appointed via High Court Legal Services Committee (authorization letter requested); Mr. Rishabh Chandra Singh Deo, P.L. for State; heard finally with consent of parties; arguments heard; judgment passed separately - no merits decided in this order sheet; digitally signed by Arpan Srivastava on 13/01/2026; typed judge name Arvind Kumar Verma.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shivchand Bariha Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 / 2

¶2

2026:CGHC:1017

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

Digitally signed by ARPAN ARPAN SRIVASTAVA SRIVASTAVA Date: 2026.01.13 10:36:18+0530 CRA No. 1374 of 2018 SHIVCHAND BARIHA versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Order Sheet

¶5

07/01/2026	None appears for the appellant even when the case is called in the second round.
	Mr. Rishabh Chandra Singh Deo, P.L. for the State/ Respondent. In view of above, this Court is inclined to decide the case after appropriating a counsel from the High Court legal Services Committee. Since none appears for the appellant and keeping in view the fact that the appellant has completed his sentence and released from jail, this Court deems it proper to decide the same by appointing a counsel from the High Court Legal Services Committee.

07/01/2026

None appears for the appellant even when the case is
called in the second round.

Mr. Rishabh Chandra Singh Deo, P.L. for the State/
Respondent.
In view of above, this Court is inclined to decide the
case after appropriating a counsel from the High Court legal
Services Committee.
Since none appears for the appellant and keeping in
view the fact that the appellant has completed his sentence
and released from jail, this Court deems it proper to decide
the same by appointing a counsel from the High Court Legal
Services Committee.

¶6

2 / 2

¶7

		In the facts and circumstances of the case, Mr. Ajeet
	Yadav, of the	Advocate is appointed to appear and argue on behalf appellant.
	issue Advoc	High Court Legal Service Committee is requested to authorization letter in favour of Mr. Ajeet Yadav, ate.
	finally	The case is taken up for hearing. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard .
		Arguments heard. Judgment passed separately.
		Sd/-
Arpan		(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge

Shivchand Bariha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shivchand Bariha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shrawan Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Tikendra Sahu @ Tikesh @ Tinku

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Chhattisgarh Pension Kalyan Sangh Branch Raigarh

Bhola Yadav @ Dhanraj Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S. Awadhesh Singh Gautam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kartikdas and Others Vs State Of Chhattisgarh