Dismissed¶37

Ved Prakash Yadav v. Shri S. Gopalakrishnan

Chhattisgarh HC15 Jul 2026CONT/933/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal/dismissal order: contempt petition CONT No. 933 of 2026 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; withdrawal sought because the petition was defective. Bench: Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge (single judge); decided 16.07.2026; NAFR. Petitioners: Ved Prakash Yadav, Ayush Hukre, Gopal Achale, Rishikesh Sharma, Deepak Mandloi, Sujeet Chaturvedi, Mohit Kumar, Tikeshwar Kumar, Manish Kumar Bhatt, Suraj Singh. Respondents: S. Gopalakrishnan, Gyanendra Pratap Singh (DG CRPF), Praveer Ranjan (DG CISF), Praveen Kumar (DG BSF), Sanjay Singhal (DG SSB). Advocate: Lalool Yadav. No statutes or precedents cited; no substantive issue decided.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition. ¶37

Ved Prakash Yadav Vs Shri S. Gopalakrishnan — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

CGHC010243192026

2026:CGHC:30129

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CONT No. 933 of 2026

¶7

1 - Ved Prakash Yadav S/o. Satanand Yadav Aged About 20 Years R/o. Nayapara, Ward No. 01 Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204074895) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶8

2 - Ayush Hukre S/o. Duliram Hukre Aged About 21 Years R/o. Kirnapur, Balaghat, District- Balaghat Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6204069600) (Allotted Post B S F)

¶9

SHOAIB ANWAR

¶10

Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.07.16 17:13:12 +0530

¶11

3 - Gopal Achale S/o Balu Singh Achale Aged About 26 Years R/o. Ralamandal, Post Lunhera, Bujurg, District- Manawardhar, Madhya Pradesh (6006038903) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶12

4 - Rishikesh Sharma S/o Brijmohan Sharma Aged About 23 Years R/o. House No. 135, Moroli, Mehgaon, Moroli, P.O. Soni, DistrictBhind, Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6005047856) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶13

5 - Deepak Mandloi S/o Bhanvarlal Mandloi Aged About 23 Years R/o. Mandawar, Narsinghgarh, District- Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6001015416) (Allotted Post I T B P )

¶14

¶15

6 - Sujeet Chaturvedi S/o Sanjeev Chaturvedi Aged About 24 Years R/o. House No. 2178/28, Behind Hotel Queen Castle, Rathode Complex Street, Sai Nagar, Fafadih, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204082621) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶16

7 - Mohit Kumar S/o Khamhan Lal Aged About 23 Years R/o. Village Kalartarai,post Office Kharenga, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204044686) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶17

8 - Tikeshwar Kumar S/o Rupram Nishadh Aged About 26 Years R/o. Ward No. 2, Baghmata, P.O. Gunderdeshi, District- Balod Chhattisgarh. (Roll No. 6204050256) ( (Allotted Post S S B)

¶18

9 - Manish Kumar Bhatt S/o Shri Krishna Mohan Bhatt Aged About 26 Years R/o. Village- Rajpura, Post Hirdaychak, District- Arwal Bihar. (Roll No. 6204024985) (Allotted Post C R P F )

¶19

10 - Suraj Singh S/o Somendra Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o. Village And Post Jaitpura Madhi, Tahsil Raun, District- Bhind, Madhya Pradesh. (Roll No. 6005033060) (Allotted Post C I S F)

¶20

... Petitioner(s)

¶21

versus

¶22

1 - Shri S. Gopalakrishnan Chairman/ Director Block No. 12, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, Pin110003

¶23

2 - Shri Gyanendra Pratap Singh, Director General C R P F

¶24

¶25

(Recruitment Branch) East Block- 07, Lavel-04, Sector- 01, R.K. Ruram, New Delhi (Through It's Director General)

¶26

3 - Shri Praveer Ranjan Directorate General C I S F (H Q) C G O Complex, Block- 13, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, P I N 110003.

¶27

4 - Shri Praveen Kumar Director General Of Border Security Force (B S F) Block- 10, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, Pin- 110003

¶28

5 - Shri Sanjay Singhal Director General Sashastra Seema Bal Block V (East), R K Puram, New Delhi, P I N 110066

¶29

... Respondent(s)

¶30

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶31

For Petitioner(s) : Shri Lalool Yadav, Advocate

¶32

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶33

Order on Board

¶34

16.07.2026

¶35

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks

¶36

permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh, as the present petition is defective one.

¶37

Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn

¶38

with the aforesaid liberty.

¶39

Sd/-

¶40

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶41

JUDGE

¶42

Shoaib

Ved Prakash Yadav v. Shri S. Gopalakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ved Prakash Yadav v. Shri S. Gopalakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Umre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramesh Chanda Bahesh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Kumar Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Sharma Vs Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Director General

Dhaniyaram Banjare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Priyanka Gaikwad Vs State of Chhattisgarh