Disposed¶22

Hem Singh Dhruv v. Mohd. Imran Khan

Chhattisgarh HC8 Jul 2026CONT/1/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, CONT No. 1 of 2021, decided 09.07.2026 by Parth Prateem Sahu, J. Hem Singh Dhruv (retired Spot Assistant) v. Mohd. Imran Khan and P.R. Vishwakarma. Contempt petition disposed of (not adjudicated on merits) because the State's writ appeal WA No. 346/2025 against the underlying writ order is pending, and in similar facts an SLP is pending before the Supreme Court with interim order dated 31.01.2024; liberty granted to file appropriate proceedings after the writ appeal is decided.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings after the decision of the writ appeal (WA No. 346/2025) filed against the order which is the subject matter of the contempt petition. ¶22

Hem Singh Dhruv Vs Mohd. Imran Khan — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

CGHC010297832020

2026:CGHC:28779

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

CONT No. 1 of 2021

¶7

Hem Singh Dhruv S/o Late Baratu Ram Dhruv Aged About 63 Years Retired Spot Assistant, R/o Village Kauwajhar, Post Tumgaon, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

ALFIZA Digitallysigned byALFIZABAIG BAIG Date:2026.07.1310:45:48+0530

¶11

1 - Mohd. Imran Khan Posted As Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension , Raipur , District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

2 - P.R. Vishwakarma Posted As Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner	: Mr. K.P. Sahu, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1	: Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate
For Respondent no. 2	: Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate

¶15

S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

09.07.2026

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that against the order, subject matter of this contempt petition, State Government has preferred a writ appeal bearing WA No. 346/2025. He also submits that in the similar facts of the case, against the order passed in the writ petition State has preferred a writ appeal which was dismissed and

¶19

2 / 2

¶20

against which State has preferred an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which is pending consideration and according to his instructions, an interim order has also been passed on 31.01.2024.

¶21

On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective respondent which is not opposed by learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that no purpose will be served in keeping this contempt petition pending.

¶22

Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings after the decision of writ appeal filed against the order, subject matter of the contempt petition.

¶23

Certified copy as per rules. sd/-

¶24

(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶25

Alfiza

Hem Singh Dhruv v. Mohd. Imran Khan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hem Singh Dhruv v. Mohd. Imran Khan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkumar Patel Vs Union of India

Bhuwan Singh Shandil (Vajpayee) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pawan Verma, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ram Lal Shrivastav Vs Mohd. Imran Khan

Shafique Mohd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pramod Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh