Dismissed¶24

Durgesh Nandini Marawi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jan 2025WPS/97/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; prayer held defective because rules not challenged, only amendment challenged; amendment providing enrollment as eligibility criteria in rule 7 of Lower Judicial Service Rule 2006 vide notification dt. 5.7.2024; consequent PSC advertisement; liberty to file afresh with proper prayer and pleadings; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Ramesh Sinha Chief Justice; Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Judge; petitioner ADPO; WPS No. 97 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file the petition afresh with proper prayer and pleadings. ¶24

Durgesh Nandini Marawi Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:1082-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 97 of 2025

¶6

1 - Durgesh Nandini Marawi D/o C.S. Marawi, Aged About 25 Years, Presently working as ADPO Raipur R/o Sr. MIG 104, Vijeta Complex, New Rajendra Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary (Law), Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶10

2 - C.G. Public Service Commission Through its Secretary, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶11

3 - High Court of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General, Bilaspur, C.G.

¶12

	...	Respondents
For Petitioner :	Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate.
For State/Respondent :	Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General	and Mr. Y.S.
No.1	Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
For Respondent No.2	Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate.
For Respondent No.3	Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivatava, Advocate.
Hon'bl Hon'ble	e Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08-01-2025

¶15

The present petition has been filed seeking following relief(s):-

¶16

“10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the instant case.

¶17

10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the amendment so far providing enrollment as eligibility criteria in rule 7 in Lower Judicial Service Rule 2006 vide

¶18

Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN

¶19

¶20

notification dt. 5.7.2024, and consequent advetisement of PSC,in the interest of Justice.

¶21

10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided to the petitioner.”

¶22

The prayer made in the present petition appears to be defective one as has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondents that the rules has not been challenged and only the amendment is challenged in the petition.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh with proper prayer.

¶24

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file it afresh with proper prayer and pleadings.

¶25

Sd/Sd/-

¶26

( Ravindra Kumar Agrawal ) ( Ramesh Sinha ) Judge Chief Justice

¶27

Aadil

Durgesh Nandini Marawi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durgesh Nandini Marawi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Asharam Paper, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Tripti Jaiswal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mr. Suresh Agarawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rasik Bala Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sohanlal Singraul Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aarti Katakwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh