Dismissed¶24

Mathura Prasad Baiga v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Apr 2025WPS/775/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Non-prosecution dismissal of writ petition; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPS 775/2017; petitioner absent in second round hearing; dismissed for loss of interest by efflux of time; pay-scale/increment claim of Ayurved compounder left undecided; single judge (Rakesh Mohan Pandey); order dated 17.04.2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:17750.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; petition dismissed solely on the ground that the petitioner, being unrepresented and absent in the second round, had lost interest in pursuing the matter. ¶24

Mathura Prasad Baiga Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:17750

NAFR

SMT NIRMALA RAO

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 775 of 2017

¶7

1 - Mathura Prasad Baiga S/o Late Shri Baratu Ram Baiga Aged About 50 Years Working As Aushadhi Sanyojak Compounder Ayurved, Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Baikinthpur, Korea, R/o Village Podi, Tehsil Seepat, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - Director, Chhattisgarh Board Of Ayurvedic And Unani System Of Medicine And Naturopathy, Government Ayurvedic College, Hospital Building, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3 - District Ayurvedic Officer, Korea, District- Korea, Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh

¶13

---- Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner : None. For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

17.04.2025

¶18

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round.

¶19

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs:

¶20

-2-

¶21

“10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner.

¶22

10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ commanding and directing the respondents to issue an appropriate order granting increments, revised pay scale and time scale pay to the petitioner on the post of Aushadhi Sanyojak (Compounder) Ayurved w.e.f. from 1994 and allied. avenues.

¶23

10.3 This Hon'ble Court may also kindly be pleased to grant any other relief (s)/ order (s)/ direction (s) in favour of the petitioner which may be considered fit and proper in the light of facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶24

It appears that by efflux of time, the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the present petition is

¶25

dismissed on this count alone.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶28

Nimmi

Mathura Prasad Baiga v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mathura Prasad Baiga v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devi Prasad Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dilip Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Yagyadutt Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Keturam Vs The Project Manager

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Murli Chauhan

Ajay Kumar Vishwakarma Vs Smt. Jaikunwar