Dismissed¶29

Dilip Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Apr 2025WPS/2280/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; WPS No. 2280 of 2017; Dilip Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh, Director/Joint Director, Urban Administration and Development, and Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Lormi/New Baradwar; writ petition challenging Order Kramank F-4-25/2013/18 dated 11/01/2017 (Annexure P-1) and Order Kramank/4316/Mu.Na.A./2017/4316 dated 20/02/2017 (Annexure P-2), also seeking records, enquiry, compensation and costs; dismissed as withdrawn on 16/04/2025 at the instance of counsel (Alok Bakshi) with no objection from respondents; single Bench of Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.; no point of law adjudicated; citable only for the fact of withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition; no substantive relief granted. ¶29

Dilip Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI

¶3

2025:CGHC:17518

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 2280 of 2017

¶7

Dilip Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Ghansi Ram Sahu, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village And Post Portha, Tahsil Samli, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhavan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

The Director, Directorate, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhavan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

The Joint Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Lormi/ New Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner :	Mr. Alok Bakshi, Advocate
For Respondents No. 1 to 3 :	Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate
For Respondent No. 4 :	Ms. Harneet Kaur, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate

¶16

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶17

16/04/2025

¶18

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶19

“ 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Order Kramank F-4-25/2013/18, New Raipur Dated 11/01/2017 issued by Upper Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (ANNEXURE P-1) and Order

¶20

¶21

Kramank/4316/Mu.Na.A./2017/4316, Naya Baradwar, Dated 20/02/2017 issued by Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Naya Baradwar, Dated 20/02/2017 issued by Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Naya Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa, C.G. (ANNEXURE P-2) in the interest of justice.

¶22

10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records specially records of D.E. from the office of the respondents in respect of petitioner’s claim for kind perusal of this Hon’ble High Court.

¶23

10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to make an enquiry for all the irregularities committed by Respondents and punish the actual culprit.

¶24

10.4 This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondents to pay compensation for undue suffering of the petitioner, to provide the cost of the petition and other expenses suffered by the petitioner.

¶25

10.5 That, any other Writ, order, directions or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

¶26