Dismissed¶¶31

Mani Ram Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Aug 2025WPS/752/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPS No. 752 of 2023; Mani Ram Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; departmental enquiry order dated 9.12.2022 Annexure P/1; charge sheet dated 16.9.2022 Annexure P/9; respondent no.2 Director Public Education Directorate; Lecturer posted at Jashpur; Department of School Education; presenting officer/DEO Jashpur; Amitendra Kishore Prasad J.; decided 05/08/2025; 2025:CGHC:38770; NAFR; no merits adjudicated; no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

The present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, the Court recording the petitioner's counsel's submission that with the afflux of time the petition had been rendered infructuous and the respondent/State's agreement therewith without objection. ¶¶31

Mani Ram Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT

¶3

2025:CGHC:38770

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 752 of 2023

¶7

1 - Mani Ram Yadav S/o Shri Shivnarayan Yadav Aged About 53 Years Occupation Service, Working As Lecturer Posted In Officer Jashpur Distt - Jashpur (C.G.).

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur (C.G.).

¶11

2 - The Director Public Education Directorate Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur Distt - Raipur (C.G.).

¶12

3 - Commissioner Surguja Division Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja (C.G.).

¶13

4 - Collector Jashpur Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.).

¶14

5 - The Joint Director Public Education Surguja Division Ambikapur, Distt - Surguja (C.G.).

¶15

6 - Additional Director S.C.E.R.T/departmental Enquiry Officer Raipur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.).

¶16

7 - Presenting Officer/in-Charge District Education Officer Jashpur, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.)

¶17

... Respondent(s)

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shubham Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate.

¶19

¶20

For Respondent(s)/ : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. State

¶21

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶22

Order on Board

¶23

05/08/2025

¶24

By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶25

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the impugned order dated 9.12.2022 ANNEXURE P/1 issued by the respondent no.2 in respect of order for holding of departmental enquiry against the petitioner.

¶26

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the charge sheet issued by the respondent no.2 against the petitioner on dated 16.9.2022 ANNEXURE P/9.

¶27

10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶28