Dismissed¶5

Pankaj Raja Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Mar 2025WPS/719/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur; WPS No. 719 of 2025; decided 04/03/2025 by Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; petitioner Pankaj Raja Patel versus State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, School Education Department; Director, Directorate of Public Instructions; DEO Balrampur Ramanujganj; BEO Wadrafnagar) and Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board; petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request with no objection from the State; no merits discussed, no statute or precedent engaged; NAFR; 2025:CGHC:10645.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn ¶5

Pankaj Raja Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed byRAVI RAVISHANKAR SHANKARMANDAVI MANDAVI Date: 2025.03.18 18:38:27 +0530

¶3

2025:CGHC:10645

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 719 of 2025

¶7

1 - Pankaj Raja Patel S/o Shri Lalit Kumar Patel Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Rampur, Post Kheti, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, C.G.

¶11

2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Department Of School Education, 1st Floor, Third Block, Indravati Bhawan, Hod Building, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3 - District Education Officer District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.)

¶13

4 - Block Education Officer Block Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (C.G.)

¶14

5 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Through Its Chairman, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector 1 Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.)492001

¶15

... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. K. M. Mehar, Advocate
For State/Respondent(s) : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
For Respondent No.5 : Mrs. Akanksha Singh, Advocate

¶16

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

04/03/2025

¶20

Heard Mr. K. M. Mehar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Aditya Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. Poorva Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s and Mrs. Akanksha Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Avinash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

¶21

At the very outset, Mr. Mehar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit under the instruction that he don’t want to press this petition and he would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.

¶22

On the other hand, Ms. Poorva Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State would not oppose the submission made by Mr. Mehar.

¶23

Permission granted.

¶24

Recording the submission made by Mr. Mehar the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶27

Ravi Mandavi

Pankaj Raja Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Raja Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Sahu and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sagar Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Rukhmani Dahariya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chintamani Choudhari Vs Coal India Ltd.

Mukesh Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jitendra Kumar Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh