Khileshwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous; writ petitions dismissed on counsel's statement that cause of action does not survive by efflux of time; no merits adjudicated. High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, WPS No. 4074 of 2016 and WPS No. 4156 of 2016, decided 06.05.2025 by Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. Petitioners: Vinay Kumar Agrawal, Rohit Kumar Gupta, Nitesh Kumar Sharma, Takeshwar Sahu, Khileshwar, Akshay Kumar, Ankur Patkar, Pawan Kumar, Jaivardhan Singh, Komesh Prasad Sahu, Deepak Singh. Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Department of Technical Education, Man Power and Planning), Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission (Secretary) and its Controller of Exams. Counsel: Zainab Vanak and Mateen Siddiqui for petitioners; Surendra Kumar Dewangan (PL) for State; Siddhant Das and Gary Mukhopadhyay for CGPSC. NAFR; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:20705. Useful only as a precedent for dismissal of stale writ petitions on consent/statement, not for any substantive proposition.