Vinay Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; writ petitions WPS No. 4074 of 2016 & WPS No. 4156 of 2016 (filed 2016) by individual petitioners against State of Chhattisgarh (Department of Technical Education, Man Power and Planning), Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission and its Controller of Exams; dismissed as infructuous on 06.05.2025 by Sanjay K. Agrawal, J., on counsel's statement that by efflux of time the cause of action does not survive; no merits adjudicated, no ratio on substantive law; useful only as a disposal record. Counsel: Ms. Zainab Vanak (for Mr. Mateen Siddiqui) for petitioners; Mr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, PL for State; Mr. Siddhant Das (for Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay) for CGPSC.
What did the court decide?
On the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that by efflux of time the cause of action does not survive and the writ petitions have become infructuous, the Court placed the statement on record and dismissed both writ petitions as having rendered infructuous, without adjudication on merits.