Dismissed¶30

Smt. Laxmin Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Aug 2025WPS/2134/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur; WPS No. 2134 of 2023; Smt. Laxmin Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.; decided 04/08/2025 by Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; petition seeking consideration of representation for compensate appointment dismissed as withdrawn after reported compromise between family members; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for withdrawal allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶30

Why is it important?

Smt. Laxmin Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT

¶3

2025:CGHC:38540

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 2134 of 2023

¶7

1 - Smt. Laxmin Bai Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Bandari, TahsilBhatgaon, District : Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - District Education Officer, Sarangarh District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 - Block Education Officer, Sarangarh District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

4 - Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Bhatagaon District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

¶15

5 - Madhusudan Sahu S/o Late Baratram Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Village- Bandari, Tahsil- Bhatagaon, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶16

... Respondent(s)

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer.

¶18

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

04/08/2025

¶21

By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶22

“10.1 That, the Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner, in the interest of justice.

¶23

10.2 That, the Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within stipulated period as per rules and norms of compensate appointment.

¶24

10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case to the petitioner.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent/State

¶26

¶27

submits that a compromise has been arrived between the family members as such learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶28

he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.

¶29

Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant writ petition is

¶30

dismissed as withdrawn .

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶33

Raghu Jat

Smt. Laxmin Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Smt. Laxmin Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Shobhana Walde Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lochan Prasad Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Surendra Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Raju Singh Vs United India Insurance Company Limited

Manish Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nansai Vs South Eastern Coal Ltd.