Retired employee's writ petition over service grievance; counsel stated the grievance had been redressed and sought permission to withdraw. With no objection from the State, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 184 of 2022
... Petitioner(s)
versus
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Ms. Azka Alam, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
29.07.2025
2
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
$iddhant
Rajesh Tiwari
State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Water Resource Department
Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department
Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Minimata Hasdeo Bango Project, Bilaspur
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
