Dismissed¶39

Pradeep Kumar Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Dec 2025WPS/1307/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pradeep Kumar Dubey and Vijay Kumar Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh and Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University; WPS No. 1307 of 2021 and WPS No. 1319 of 2021; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Bibhu Datta Guru, J.; order dated 05/12/2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:59233; recovery order dated 21/12/2020 (Annexure P/12); Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, Raipur; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to question future recovery order; premature writ petition; no recovery effected till date; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to question the order of recovery passed in future, if any; no objection was raised by the other side. ¶39

Pradeep Kumar Dubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:59233

SOURABH BHILWAR

Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.12.08 10:35:11 +0530

¶5

NAFR

¶6

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPS No. 1307 of 2021

¶8

Pradeep Kumar Dubey S/o Late Shri Janki Prasad Dubey Aged About 64 Years R/o Senior Mig 50, Sector 10, Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶9

--- Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶13

3 - Assistant Director (Revenue) Directorate Of Higher Education, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - Deputy Director Local Fund Audit Divisional Treasury, Accounts, And Pension Building, Behind Ghadi Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶15

5 - The Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University Through Its Registrar Great Eastern Road, Amanaka, Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶16

--- Respondent(s)

¶17

and

¶18

¶19

WPS No. 1319 of 2021

¶20

Vijay Kumar Pandey S/o Bodhan Lal Pandey Aged About 66 Years R/o H.No. 1540/40, Gopi Std Road, Behind Vijeta Palace Gali, Shanti Vihar Colony, Dangania, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶21

--- Petitioner

¶22

Versus

¶23

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

2 - The Secretary Higher Education Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶25

3 - Assistant Director (Revenue) Directorate Of Higher Education, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶26

4 - Deputy Director Local Fund Audit, Divisional Treasury, Accounts And Pension Building, Behind Ghadi Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶27

5 - The Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University Through Its Registrar, Great Eastern Road, Amanaka, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶28

... Respondents

¶29

(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)

¶30

For Petitioners	: Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate
For Respondents/State	: Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, Dy. Advocate General
For Respondent No.5	: Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate appeared through VC and Ms. Deeksha Pandey, Advocate

¶31

¶32

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶33

Order on Board

¶34

05/12/2025

¶35

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners herein are challenging the impugned recovery order dated 21/12/2020 (Annexure P/12) whereby some recovery has to be done from the petitioners.

¶36

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent No.5, on instructions, would submit that the impugned order dated 21/12/2020 is merely a communication between the Office of respondent No.4/ Deputy Director, Local Fund Audit, Raipur, (C.G.) and the respondent No.5/ Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur and till date no recovery has been made from the petitioners, hence the present petitions preferred by the petitioners are premature.

¶37

In view of the above submission, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to question the order of recovery passed in future, if any.

¶38

No objection from the other side.

¶39

Accordingly, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

¶40

(BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

$. Bhilwar

Pradeep Kumar Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Sai Dk Engineering and Projects Private Limited Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

M/S Sai Engineering, Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

Jeevan Majhwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashwani Kumar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Vinay Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kumar Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh