Petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an acquittal appeal. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:5131
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPL No. 19 of 2025
Digitally signed bySIDDHANT SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.01.29 18:26:08 +0530
(The Petitioner No.1 Waas Not A Party Before The Industrial Court But Has Been Impleaded As Petitioner No.1 In The Instant Petition As The Proper Course Is To Implead The State Government Through The Secretary Of The Concerned Department)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
For State/Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Kale, Add. Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
29.01.2025
2
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
$iddhant
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Labour
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Deputy/assistant Director, Industrial Health And Safety
Shri Dhananjay Singh
Shri B.K. Singh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
