Panna Lal v. Rajendra Agrawal
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous-petition dismissal before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WP227 No. 47 of 2020 (neutral citation 2025:CGHC:4887), decided 28.01.2025 by Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J. Petitioners Panna Lal, Kali Ram and Anil Agrawal (represented by Aman Upadhyay, Advocate) against respondents Rajendra, Vinod, Satish and Shuneel Agrawal, all of Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. Dismissed on counsel's own statement that by efflux of time the petition had become infructuous; no merits adjudicated, no statute or precedent cited, no costs or quantum awarded; bearing the NAFR mark.
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded learned counsel's statement that by efflux of time the petition had become infructuous, and dismissed the petition as rendered infructuous; no substantive issue was adjudicated. ¶22