Dismissed¶23

Murlidhar Agrawal v. Bhagwati Bai

Chhattisgarh HC3 Mar 2025WPC/940/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPC No. 940 of 2023, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 04/03/2025 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; challenge was to SDO (Revenue) proceeding, but final order dated 01/02/2024 already passed in appeal No. 202106050100052/A-6A/2021-22; petitioner absent in second round; liberty reserved to file afresh if grievance persists. Parties: Murlidhar Agrawal (through POA Kamesh Agrawal) v. Bhagwati Bai, Usha, Satyanarayan, Jaynarayan, SDO (R) Korba and Tehsildar Korba. No statutes or precedents discussed; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the petitioner was given liberty to approach this Court again if the grievance still exists. ¶23

Murlidhar Agrawal Vs Bhagwati Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:10584

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 940 of 2023

¶6

1 - Murlidhar Agrawal S/o. Late Gorelal Agrawal, Aged About 80 Years R/o. Balauda Road, Akaltara, P.S. And Tehsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh Through Power Of Attorney Kamesh Agrawal, S/o. Murlidhar Agrawal Aged About 39 Years, R/o. Akaltara, P.S. And Tehsil Akaltara, District RAHUL JHA : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.03.05 17:22:20 +0530 Petitioner(s)

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Bhagwati Bai Wd/o. Babulal, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kharmora, Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2 - Usha D/o. Late Babulal, Aged About 30 Years W/o. Laxminarayan, R/o Village Kharmora, Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3 - Satyanarayan, S/o. Late Babulal, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kharmora, Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶12

4 - Jaynarayan, S/o Late Babulal, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kharmora, Tehsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶13

5 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶14

6 - The Tehsildar, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

¶15

Respondent(s)

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: None
For Resp. 1 to 4	: Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate
For State	: Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA

¶17

¶18

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

04/03/2025

¶21

At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4 would submit that in the appeal No. 202106050100052/A-6A/2021-22, final order has been passed on 01/02/2024, whereas, in the instant writ petition, the proceeding of the SDO (Revenue) was under challenge, as such this petition has become infructuous.

¶22