Dismissed¶¶22

Sayyad Asif Ali v. Chhattisgarh State Election Commission

Chhattisgarh HC3 Mar 2025WPC/553/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition for want of prosecution / non-prosecution; petitioner absent despite repeated calls; Chhattisgarh State Election Commission; Deputy Secretary State Election Commission; Collector-cum-District Election Officer (Local Election) Durg; Municipal Corporation Durg; WPC No. 553 of 2025; single judge Bibhu Datta Guru; order dated 04/03/2025; NAFR; no merits discussed; no costs imposed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sayyad Asif Ali Vs Chhattisgarh State Election Commission — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2025:CGHC:10577

¶3

Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2025.03.05 17:34:33 +0530

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

NAFR

¶6

WPC No. 553 of 2025

¶7

1 Sayyad Asif Ali S/o Sayyad Anwar Ali Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 08, Takiya Para, City District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Through The State Election Commissioner, Nirvachan Bhawan, Sector - 19, North Block, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 Deputy Secretary State Election Commission, Nirvachan Bhawan, Sector - 19, North Block, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 Collector Cum District Election Officer (Local Election) Durg, City District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

4 Municipal Corporation Durg Through Commissioner, Hindi Bhawan, G.E. Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: None
For	: Ms. Shweta Kumari on behalf of Shri Ranvir
Respondent(s)	Singh Marhas, Advocate
No. 1 & 3
For Respondent	: Shri Rakshit Tiwari on behalf of Shri Pankaj
No. 4	Agrawal, Advocate

¶17

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

04/03/2025

Heard.

On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the matter. Since no one is appearing, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.

¶22

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Bibhu Datta Guru)

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

Jyoti

Sayyad Asif Ali v. Chhattisgarh State Election Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sayyad Asif Ali v. Chhattisgarh State Election Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Steelco Ispat Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Pratima Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ayush Trading Company Vs Chhattisgarh State Co. Operative Marketing Federation Limited

Shatruhan Lal Suryavanshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Murlidhar Agrawal Vs Bhagwati Bai