Disposed¶25

Narendra Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC27 Jan 2025WPC/531/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Narendra Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh; WPC No. 531 of 2025; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; decided 28.01.2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:4843; land demarcation; Revenue Case No. 202211300500034A//12 of 2022; Khasra No. 183/11 & 151/4; village Mohla; Tehsildar Mohla; Deputy Collector communication dated 16.02.2024; direction to conclude demarcation within 50 days; writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tehsildar to conclude the demarcation proceeding in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days. ¶25

Narendra Nishad Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:4843

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 531 of 2025

¶6

1 - Narendra Nishad S/o Late Rajaram Nishad Aged About 50 Years Caste- Kewat, R/o Village- Mohla, Tahsil- Mohla, District- Mohla-ManpurAmbagarh Chowki (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

Digitally signed by SHOAIB SHOAIB ANWAR ANWAR Date: 2025.01.28 23:28:40 +0530

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

2 - Collector (Land Record Branch) District - Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.)

¶12

3 - Tahsildar Mohla, District- Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.)

¶13

4 - Revenue Inspector Mohla, District - Mohla- Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.)

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Panel Lawyer.

¶17

¶18

Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

28.01.2025

¶21

By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent no. 3 Tehsildar to conclude the demarcation proceeding in Revenue Case No. 202211300500034A//12 of the year 2022.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the proceeding of the Tehsildar for demarcation of the land bearing Khasra No. 183/11 & 151/4 situated in village Mohla, District Mohla-ManpurAmbagarh is not being done by the Tehsildar, in spite of the repeated request of the petitioner, even the Deputy Collector vide its communication dated 16.02.2024 has directed the Tehsildar to conclude the demarcation proceeding.

¶23

Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that if the application filed by the petitioner for demarcation of the land in question is still pending before the Tehsildar, the same shall be concluded within a stipulated period.

¶24

I have heard both the counsels for the parties.

¶25

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Tehsildar to conclude the demarcation proceeding in accordance with law, within a period of 50 days.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶28

Shoaib

Narendra Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Nishad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jacob Kurian Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gevarchand Kurrey Vs Gram Panchayat Mainpurkhurd

M/S M.K. Gupta and Company a Registered Partnership Firm Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nikita Patel Vs Shaheed Nandkumar Patel Vishwavidyalaya Raigarh

Chhattisgarh Private School Managment Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh