Smt. Jayaben Chopada v. the Additional Collector and Prescribed Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous writ petitions dismissed; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WPC No. 300 of 2022; WPC No. 309 of 2022; WPC No. 324 of 2022; petitioners Nanji Bhai Chopada, Hitesh Kumar Chopada, Champaben Chopada, Jayaben Chopada, Reetaben Chopada; respondents Additional Collector and Prescribed Officer Special Rail Project District Bastar, Chief Administrative Officer South East Central Railway Bilaspur, Commissioner Bastar Division cum Prescribed Officer (Arbitrator) under the Railways Act 1989; counsel Shyam Kumar (on behalf of Achyut Tiwari) for petitioners, Poorva Tiwari P.L. for respondents; single-judge order by Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma dated 17/06/2025; petitions not pressed; State Counsel raised no objection; no merits adjudication, no cases cited, no monetary award.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous, following the learned counsel for petitioners' submission that the matters have become infructuous and he does not want to press the present petitions, to which learned State Counsel had no objection.