Champaben Chopada v. the Additional Collector and Prescribed Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of writ petitions as infructuous; counsel declined to press petitions and State Counsel raised no objection; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur, order dated 17/06/2025 (neutral citation as printed: 2025:CGHC:24868); single-judge bench of Arvind Kumar Verma; petitioners Nanji Bhai Chopada, Hitesh Kumar Chopada, Champaben Chopada, Jayaben Chopada and Reetaben Chopada; respondents include Additional Collector and Prescribed Officer Special Rail Project Bastar, Chief Administrative Officer South East Central Railway Bilaspur, and Commissioner Bastar Division cum Prescribed Officer (Arbitrator) under the Railways Act 1989; no merits adjudication, no issues decided, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Upon learned counsel for the petitioners submitting that the matters had become infructuous and that he did not wish to press the petitions, and with learned State Counsel raising no objection, the Court dismissed the writ petitions as having become infructuous.