Dismissed¶¶27

M/S Jitendra Kumar Thakur, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC10 Jan 2025WPC/1513/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; WPC No. 1513 of 2019; decided 10/01/2025; Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; petition dismissed for want of prosecution; no representation by petitioner even in two rounds; claim for release of final bill Rs.59,39,837 with 18% interest from 31 January 2018; respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Department of Agriculture and Biotechnology), Vice-Chancellor, Registrar and Executive Engineer (Nirman Vibhag), Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University; no statutes or precedents cited; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution; the monetary claim was not adjudicated. ¶¶27

M/S Jitendra Kumar Thakur, Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI

¶3

2025:CGHC:1710

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 1513 of 2019

¶7

M/s Jitendra Kumar Thakur, Through Proprietor - Jitendra Kumar Thakur S/o D.S. Thakur, Aged About 43 Years, Resident - Flat No. 203, Golden Ock, Green Garden Colony Mangla, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

The Vice - Chancellor, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C.G. K. V. ) Anjora, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶12

The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C.G.K.V.) Anjora, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Executive Engineer, (Nirman Vibhag ) Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu University (C.G.K.V.) Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner	: None even in two round
For Respondent No. 1	: Mr. S.P. Kale, Add.Adv.Gen.

¶16

For Respondents No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Ashutosh Kachhawaha, Advocate

¶17

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶18

10/01/2025

¶19

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-

¶20

“ 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call for the records of the case pertaining to the petitioner from the respondents for its kind perusal.

¶21

10.2 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the lawfully due and admitted amount of final bill amounting to Rs.59,39,837 (fifty

¶22

¶23

nine lacs thirty nine thousand eight hundred thirty seven) in favour of the petitioner.

¶24

10.3 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the final bill amounting to Rs.59,39,837 (fifty nine lacs thirty nine thousand eight hundred thirty seven) with 18% interest from 31 January 2018.

¶25

10.4 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case.”

¶26

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds.

¶27

In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶28

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶29

vatti

M/S Jitendra Kumar Thakur, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Jitendra Kumar Thakur, v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Laxminarayan Sahu Vs Chetan Gayakwad

Gulshan Kumar Saluja Vs Satish Kumar Saluja

Srishti Sinha Vs Ravishkant Agrawal

Nanki Bai Vs Sub Divisional Officer

M/s Radhika Water and Amusement Park Kota Vs The State Of C.g. and Ors.

Ku. Sunita (Died), Lrs Sahodari Pando Vs the Chairman