Dismissed¶28

Smt. Laxmibai Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Feb 2025WA/118/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous; elections already notified and held; challenge to judgment dated 23.04.2024 in W.P. (C) No. 1699/2024 (Smt. Amrika Bai Ajagalay Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.); High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; WA No. 118 of 2025; 2025:CGHC:8114-DB; Department of Panchayat and Rural Development; Balodabazar-Bhatapara / Kasdol / Khapridih; Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice; Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge; decided 17.02.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous. ¶28

Smt. Laxmibai Vaishnav Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:8114-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WA No. 118 of 2025

¶6

Smt. Laxmibai Vaishnav W/o Shri Maheshwar Das Vaishnav Aged About 52 Years R/o Village - Khapridih, Tahsil - Tundra, Janpad Panchayat - Kasdol, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.)

¶7

... Appellant(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

3 - Collector District Baloda Bazar- Bhantapara (C.G.)

¶12

4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Prescribed Authority, At Giroadh District Baloda Bazar-Bhantapara (C.G.)

¶13

5 - Tahsildar Giroadh District Baloda Bazar-Bhantapara (C.G.)

¶14

6 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kasdol District Baloda Bazar-Bhantapara (C.G.)

¶15

7 - Smt. Amrika Bai Ajagalay W/o Shri Amrit Ajagalay Aged About 31 Years By Post - Panch, Ward No. 14, Gram Panchayat Khapridih, Post - Kumhari, Police Station - Gidhouri, Janpad Panchayat - Kasdol And District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶16

... Respondent(s)

¶17

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ujjwal Choubey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No.7 : Mr. Jameel Akhtar Lohani

¶18

¶19

Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶20

Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶23

17.02.2025

¶24

The appellant had filed the present appeal with the following

¶25

prayer :

¶26

“It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the appeal by setting-aside the judgment order dated 23.04.2024 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1699/2024 between Smt. Amrika Bai Ajagalay Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors, in the interest of justice.”

¶27

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as the elections have already been notified and has been held hence the matter has already become infructuous.

¶28

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶29

Learned State counsel appearing for respondents / State is present.

¶30

Sd/Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice

¶31

Manpreet

Smt. Laxmibai Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Laxmibai Vaishnav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Arti Thombare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Tosh Kumar Sinha

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Mrs. Babita Bhoi

Ashish Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Shri Gajanan Saw Mill, Steel and Wooden Furniture Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited

Ayush Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh