Ajay Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Feb 2025MCC/111/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition (WPC No.204/2025) dismissed for want of prosecution on 14.01.2025; counsel's inadvertent non-appearance on listing date; MCC allowed and case restored to original number; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; Justice Bibhu Datta Guru; petitioner Ajay Gupta; respondents State of Chhattisgarh (Revenue and Disaster Management), Collector Sakti, SDO (Revenue)/LAO Dabhara, Tahsildar Dabhara; underlying subject matter of the restored WPC not stated in this order.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WPC No.204/2025 to its original number ¶¶21

Ajay Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2025:CGHC:6189

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 111 of 2025

¶6

1 - Ajay Gupta S/o Purshottam Das Aged About 45 Years R/o Devendra Nagar Raipur City, C- 22, Sector 2 Main Road, Siltara Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 – Collector, Sakti, District - Sakti (C.G.)

¶11

3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Dabhara, District - Janjgir -Champa (Now District - Sakti (C.G.)

¶12

4 – Tahsildar, Dabhara, District - Sakti (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

(Cause title is t	aken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner	: Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate
For Respondent/ State	: Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer

¶15

2 / 2

¶16

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

04/02/2025

¶19

This MCC has been filed for restoration of WPC No.204/2025, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2025.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above matter was listed on 14/01/2025 but due to some in advertent mistake, he could not appear before this Court and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶21

On due consideration, the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and the pleadings made in the MCC, it is allowed. WPC No.204/2025 is restored to its original number.

¶22

Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

$. Bhilwar

Ajay Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uttam Kumar Gilhare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Kumar Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Banka Constructions Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Aisha Begam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahabir Enterprises Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Md. Aslam Vs the State of Chhattisgarh