Dismissed¶21

Rajkumar Lonia v. Ramu Lonia

Chhattisgarh HC24 Jul 2025MA/62/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; MA No. 62 of 2017; order dated 25.7.2025 by Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.; miscellaneous appeal (civil, arising from a suit) dismissed for want of prosecution/default due to complete non-appearance of appellants despite repeated calls; no adjudication on merits, no statutory provisions or case law cited; single-judge short order; relevant only to practice points on consequences of claimant non-prosecution.

What did the court decide?

The miscellaneous appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared for the appellants when the case was called for hearing, even on repeated calls, and the Court held it had no other option except to dismiss the appeal. ¶21

Rajkumar Lonia Vs Ramu Lonia — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:36291

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MA No. 62 of 2017

¶6

1 - Rajkumar Lonia S/o Shri Ramu Lonia, Aged About 48 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Phool Bai Lonia W/o Ramu Lonia, Aged About 60 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ................. Plaintiffs

¶7

... Appellants

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Ramu Lonia S/o Late Vishesar Lonia, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Navrangpur Para Aaureha, P.O. Dindori, P.S. Lormi, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Shyam Prasad Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

3 - Sanjay Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 34 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 4 - Sushil Lonia S/o Late Sevakram Lonia, Aged About 30 Years R/o Ghutku Loniapara P.O. Ghutku, P.S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ................ Defendants

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

For Appellants : None present For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer

¶14

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

Digitally
signed by BINI
BINI PRADEEP
PRADEEP Date:2025.07.28
10:27:34
+0530

¶17

¶18

25.7.2025

¶19

1 . None present for the appellants when the case is called for hearing. Even on repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the matter.

¶20

2. In this circumstances, this Court has left with no other option except dismiss the misc. appeal for want of prosecution.

¶21

3. Accordingly, misc. appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Naresh Kumar Chadnravanshi)

¶24

Judge

¶25

Bini