Dismissed¶¶22

Kusumlata Sahu v. Purushottam Kumar Sahu

Chhattisgarh HC13 Oct 2025FA(MAT)/159/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; FA(MAT) No. 159 of 2023; Kusumlata Sahu v. Purushottam Kumar Sahu; challenge to Family Court, Durg judgment and decree dated 10.04.2023; dismissed as infructuous on 14.10.2025 after mutual divorce between the parties on 11.06.2025; coram Rajani Dubey and Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ.; NAFR (non-reportable); no statutes or precedents discussed; keywords: matrimonial appeal, mutual divorce, infructuous dismissal, Family Court Durg.

What did the court decide?

Since the parties have taken a mutual divorce on 11.06.2025 during the pendency of the appeal and nothing further survives for adjudication, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. ¶¶22

Kusumlata Sahu Vs Purushottam Kumar Sahu — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

RAGHVENDRAJAT Digitallysigned byRAGHVENDRAJAT

¶3

2025:CGHC:51020-DB

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

FA(MAT) No. 159 of 2023

¶7

Kusumlata Sahu W/o Purushottam Sahu Aged About 25 Years D/o Poshan Lal Sahu R/o Near Krishna Kirana Store, Near Adarsh Nagar Kasaridih, Durg, P.S. Padmanabhpur, District And Tehsil Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

Purushottam Kumar Sahu S/o Kapil Ram Aged About 29 Years R/o Qtr No. 07/d, Cross Street 01, Sector 01, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶11

... Respondent(s)

¶12

For Appellant(s)	: Ms. Vaishali Jeswani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Advocate on behalf
	of Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Advocate.

¶13

Hon'ble Smt. Rajani Dubey, Judge

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad , Judge

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

¶17

Per Rajani Dubey, Judge 14/10/2025

¶18

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant with the following relief(s):-

¶19

“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be decree pleased to allow this appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 10.04.2023 passed by Family Court, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), in the interest of justice.”

¶20

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the instant appeal has become infructuous as mutual divorce has been taken place between the parties on 11.6.2025.

¶21

3. Learned counsel for the other side concurs with the above submission.

¶22

4. In view of above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the appeal is dismissed as infructous.

¶23

Sd/Sd/(Rajani Dubey) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge

¶24

Raghu Jat

Kusumlata Sahu v. Purushottam Kumar Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kusumlata Sahu v. Purushottam Kumar Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Poonam Singh Vs Vinod Roy

Vinod Kumar Roy Vs Smt. Punam Singh

Smt. Sarita Sahu Vs Rupesh Kumar Sahu

Smt. Hiro Bai Manikpuri Vs Smt. Arunabai Manikpuri

Smt. Monika Tamrakar Vs Prashant Kumar Tamrakar

Shri Rajesh Chelani Vs Smt. Usha Chelani