The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a civil appeal as the appellant allegedly did not wish to press the matter further after an amended cause-list. The order recorded no substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:53868
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 167 of 2013
1 - Resham Lal Sahu S/o Het Ram Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Kewali, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant(s)
versus
1 - Damodar Sidar S/o Moharsay Aged About 32 Years R/o Khantipar, Kharsiya, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Order on Board
04/11/2025
VED
PRAKASH
DEWANGAN
Digitally signed
by VED
PRAKASH
DEWANGAN
Date: 2025.11.04
19:23:13 +0530
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
ved
Resham Lal Sahu
Damodar Sidar
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
