Dismissed¶32

Rekha Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Nov 2025CRMP/3320/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh HC (Bilaspur) dismisses CRMP No. 3320 of 2025 (petitioners Rekha Pandey and Yogesh Kumar Pandey, Durg) as defective on 07.11.2025; petition sought extension of interim protection till filing of khatama/chargesheet; liberty to file afresh with better particulars; Rs.5,000 cost directed to Government Special School for Visually Handicapped boys and Girls, Jashpur (C.G.); Bench: Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice with Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars, subject to deposit of Rs.5,000/- as cost (to be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visually Handicapped boys and Girls, Jashpur (C.G.)); certified copies of documents annexed to the petition to be returned to counsel after retaining photocopies. ¶32

Rekha Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:54305-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

Digitally BABLU signed by RAJENDRA BABLU BHANARKAR RAJENDRA BHANARKAR

¶6

CRMP No. 3320 of 2025

¶7

1 - Rekha Pandey W/o Yogesh Kumar Pandey Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 824 Road No. 9, Behind Puri Iti, Chander Nagar, Ward No. 14, Shanti Nagar, Kohkabhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

2 - Yogesh Kumar Pandey S/o D.N. Pandey Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 824, Road No. 09, Behind Puri Iti, Chander Nagar, Ward No. 14, Shanti Nagar, Kohkabhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

2 - Station House Officer P.S. City Kotwali, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

3 - Santosh Kumar Prajapati S/o Late Sugreev Prasad Prajapati Aged About 47 Years Permanent R/o House No. 4, Type 3 Ittc Complex, Bsnl, Neelpur, Rajpura, Patilala, Punjab 100101, Other Address House No. 1326, Ward No. 9, Main Road, Kohka, Khurud, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

4 - Smt. Sangeeta Pandit D/o Late Surgreev Prasad Prajapati Aged About 44 Years Permanent R/o Flat No. 1, Plot No. 19, Sweet Home Apartment, Nit Lay Out, Telecom Nagar, Nagpur, (Maharashtra), Other Add- House No. 1326, Ward No. 9, Main Road Kohka, Khurud, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

¶16

5 - Amit Kumar Prajapati S/o Narendra Prajapati Aged About 21 Years House No. 1326, Ward No. 9, Main Road, Kohka, Khurud, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶17

6 - Smt. Manju Pandit W/o Nirmal Kumar Pandit Aged About 45 Years R/o B 28, Near Kota Mandir, Kota, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶18

7 - Sanjeev Kumar Dutta S/o Shri S.K. Dutta Aged About 50 Years R/o Shivanand Nagar, Sector-1, Khamtarai, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶19

... Respondent(s)

¶20

For Petitioners : Mr.Pushp Gupta, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Sauyma Rai, Panel Lawyer

¶21

No.1 and 2/State

¶22

Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶23

Order on Board

¶24

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶25

07.11.2025

¶26

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :-

¶27

“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and since the interim protection granted for the period of 3 weeks within which chargesheet / khatama ought to have been filed and same is not filed, the period of interim protection be extended till filing of khatam or chargesheet or to that extend as this Hon'ble Court deem fit.”

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be

¶29

¶30

permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a petition with better particulars.

¶31

From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that the petition drafted by learned counsel for the petitioners is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the petition is defective one and liable to be dismissed on this ground alone.

¶32

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with better particulars, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visually Handicapped boys and Girls, Jashpur (C.G.).

¶33

Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photocopies of the same.

¶34

Sd/- Sd/-

¶35

(Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice

¶36

Bablu

Rekha Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rekha Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Boyar @ Manboyar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jawahar Chandra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Madhuri Mandle @ Madhu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Kumar Baghel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shakuntala Dhruw Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh Tax Bar Council , Vs Union of India