No. 552 Rajneesh to the office of CSP Bhilai Nagar with the written information Exhibit P/1, the details of which were registered at S. No. 37 in Exhibit P/24. Then constable Rajneesh came back after giving the information and informed that C.S.P. Sir is outside, the same information has been entered at S. No. 38 in Exhibit P/25. After that, he prepared the Informant Information Panchnama in front of witnesses Swati Das and Kailash Pal, in which it was recorded that in view of the possibility of absconding of the accused, it was necessary to proceed without obtaining a search warrant, which is Exhibit P/7. This information was intimidated to CSP Bhilai nagar and to the trial court. In this way PW-5/ C. Tirkey has proved the fact in paragraph 1 and 2 of his evidence that as soon as he received the informant's information, he entered it in Exhibit P/22 and immediately informed to C.S.P. Bhilai Nagar (Ex. P/1), thereafter he entered the grounds of his belief in Exhibit P7, the information of which was transmitted to the CSP. PW-5/C. Tirkey has admitted in paragraph 18 of his cross-examination that after the arrival of two independent witnesses, he prepared the informer information panchnama.
